Title
Supreme Court
Calim vs. Court of Appeals
Case
G.R. No. 140065
Decision Date
Feb 13, 2001
Police officer Benito Calim shot and killed Esmeraldo Ty in 1993, claiming self-defense. Courts rejected his plea, ruling the killing unjustified, and convicted him of homicide, increasing damages to Ty's heirs.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 140065)

Charges and Initial Proceedings

Calim was charged with murder through an information filed by the provincial prosecutor on December 21, 1993. The charge detailed that Calim, with intent to kill and evident premeditation and treachery, unlawfully shot Ty multiple times with a .38 caliber revolver, inflicting fatal injuries. Upon pleading not guilty, Calim underwent trial, where the prosecution presented witnesses who detailed the events surrounding Ty's death.

Evidence Presented

Witness testimonies indicated that on the night of the incident, after a drinking session, Calim emerged from the disco and indiscriminately fired his weapon at Ty from approximately five meters away. Ty sustained multiple gunshot wounds, leading to his immediate death. The autopsy report identified severe hemorrhage due to the gunshot wounds as the cause of death.

Defense and Claim of Self-Defense

In his defense, Calim admitted to shooting Ty but argued that he acted in self-defense. He claimed that Ty was armed with a knife and had threatened those around him, including himself. Calim asserted that after shooting a warning shot, Ty attacked him, prompting him to fire at Ty's arm and knee before shooting him in the torso.

Judicial Findings at Trial Court

The trial court did not accept Calim's self-defense claim, asserting that he failed to establish the necessary elements to justify it, primarily the absence of unlawful aggression from Ty. The court found that his actions were disproportionate to any purported threat, highlighting that Calim continued to shoot a significantly wounded Ty.

Court of Appeals Decision

The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's decision, concluding that the evidence presented aligned with the prosecution's narrative and contradicted Calim's assertions. The Appeals Court found Calim's account incredible and maintained that self-defense could not be substantiated given the circumstances described, including the number and severity of Ty's wounds.

Legal Principles on Self-Defense

The ruling emphasized the burden of proof on the accused to demonstrate the elements of self-defense: unlawful aggression, reasonable necessity of the means employed, and lack of sufficient provocation. The courts concluded that Calim's actions did not meet these criteria, particularly as no immediate threat existed given the distance and the nature of Ty's alleged aggression.

Verdict on the Charge

Ultimately, Calim was convicted of homicide as opposed to murder, since elements such as treachery and evident premeditation were not sufficiently established. The courts deemed that the act was not premeditated but constituted culpable homicide based on reckless disregard for human life.

Sentence and Damages Awarded

Calim received a s

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.