Title
Cajipe vs. People
Case
G.R. No. 203605
Decision Date
Apr 23, 2014
Police officers accused of murdering a father and daughter during a shootout; charges dismissed due to lack of probable cause, affirmed by Supreme Court.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 203605)

Initial Complaint and Incident Description

Lilian filed a complaint with the Department of Justice on July 28, 2009, alleging that certain members of the PNP, specifically from the Highway Patrol Group and the Special Action Force, engaged in a conspiracy leading to the deaths of her husband and child. Lilian recounted her attempts to contact Jun and her ultimate discovery that they were involved in a police shootout. Tragically, Lia was found deceased from a gunshot wound, and Jun was found shot dead, supposedly while trying to rescue his daughter.

Judicial Proceedings and Early Outcomes

On December 28, 2009, the DOJ found probable cause to file murder charges against the accused police officers. Subsequently, on March 15, 2010, the DOJ filed the appropriate information before the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Paranaque City. The petitioners, asserting the violation of their constitutional rights, filed an omnibus motion seeking the annulment of the DOJ's resolution and requested the dismissal of the information based on a lack of probable cause.

RTC Dismissal and Reconsideration

On June 16, 2010, the RTC dismissed the case against the petitioner HPG officers for lack of probable cause, noting the absence of witness testimony linking them directly to the crime. The RTC characterized the petitioners as merely acting as a blocking force during a legitimate police operation. Lilian’s motion for reconsideration was denied on September 24, 2010, leading to further judicial proceedings.

Appeal to the Court of Appeals

The Office of the Solicitor General (OSG) filed a petition for certiorari with the Court of Appeals (CA) on January 21, 2011, asserting the RTC's grave abuse of discretion in dismissing the charges. On June 15, 2012, the CA agreed with the OSG, finding that the RTC had failed to adequately evaluate the testimonies from witnesses linking the petitioners to the shooting. The CA ordered the issuance of warrants for the arrest of the HPG officers.

Legal Issues Presented

This case raises important procedural issues, specifically regarding:

  1. The appropriateness of the CA's granting of the OSG’s petition given the final nature of the RTC’s dismissal order.
  2. The calculation of the prescriptive period for filing the Rule 65 petition based on the timing of the notice.
  3. The CA's determination of grave abuse of discretion by the RTC in dismissing the charges against the HPG officers.

Court Rulings on Procedural Matters

The Court stressed that the RTC had the authority to dismiss the case if evidence for probable cause was insufficient, a discretion outlined in Section 6, Rule 112 of the Rules of Criminal Procedure. The CA should have denied the OSG’s special civil action for certiorari because it was not an appropriate remedy; the order of the RTC was considered a final order and, thus, had alternative appeal routes available.

Dismissal of Certiorari Petition

The Court underscored that the OSG’s petition was not timely, being filed 112 days after the city prosecutor received the RTC's dismissal order, thereby exceeding the 60-day limit. This established that the order was no longer subject to appellate review, leading the Court to re

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.