Case Summary (G.R. No. 9408)
Key Facts and Proceedings
The petitioner applied for two parcels of land, which are the subject of two separate cases pending before the court. The key evidence presented includes deeds of sale that imply ownership by the petitioner, originating from sales by local Moro individuals. The registration is contested on the grounds that these lands are considered property of the United States, acquired through cession from Spain via the Treaty of Paris, and that they form part of a military reservation.
Findings of Ownership Claims
The two parcels claimed by the petitioner have distinct histories of ownership. The first parcel (case No. 6908) was purchased from Gabriel Salzos, based on his prior purchase from a Moro woman, Alanga, whose authority to sell was not substantiated by a necessary power of attorney from her husband, Darondon. The second parcel (case No. 6909) was purportedly purchased from Datto Bunglay, although the acknowledgment of the deed was significantly delayed.
Examination of Cultural Context and Laws
The court examined the traditional customs surrounding land ownership among the Moro people, revealing that land was often treated as common property within tribal jurisdictions, especially prior to American occupation. It highlighted that claims of ownership by individual Moros were often ambiguous, lacking official acknowledgment and legal frameworks for transfer or sale.
Court's Assessment of Evidence
The trial court found substantial evidence indicating that the lands in question were previously cultivated by the original Moro occupants, specifically by Darondon and his wife, providing grounds for their continuous possession. However, witnesses presented conflicting accounts about the cultivation and habitation of the larger land parcel, suggesting questions about Bunglay’s claim over some areas.
Implications of Legal Restrictions
The court recognized the restrictions imposed by American law under Act No. 718, which prohibited the sale or transfer of land by tribal leaders without government approval. The court noted that while the sale of common tribal land was prohibited, individual sales such as those claimed by the petitioner could potentially be valid, contingent upon the specific authority of the sellers.
Conclusion on Cla
...continue readingCase Syllabus (G.R. No. 9408)
Case Overview
- The appellant, Demetria Cacho, seeks the adjudication and registration of a tract of land located within the "Camp Overton military reservation."
- The trial judge, Honorable Jesse George, issued a comprehensive opinion regarding the case, partially granting and partially denying the appellant's petition.
- The Supreme Court affirms the findings of fact by the trial judge, concluding that the reasoning in his opinion adequately addresses the issues presented.
Background Information
- The application for land registration involves two parcels situated in Iligan, Moro Province, Philippine Islands.
- The Government of the United States, represented by the commanding general of the Division of the Philippines, opposes the registration, asserting that the parcels are U.S. property acquired through the Treaty of Paris and are part of the military reservation.
Parties Involved
- Petitioner: Demetria Cacho, represented by attorney D. Leocadio J. Italia.
- Respondent: The Government of the United States, represented by military officers, including Capt. H. V. Evans, Capt. Guy S. Nurvell, and Lieut. Milton G. Holliday.
- Trial Judge: Honorable Jesse George.
Findings of Fact
Parcel in Case No. 6908:
- Purchased by Demetria Cacho from Gabriel Salzos; deed dated September 14, 1904, but the sale occurred on December 17, 1903.
- Title derived from a deed executed by a Moro woman, Alanga, on behalf of her husband, Darondon, without presenting necessary authorization.
- Evidence shows that the land has been cultivated and occupied by Darondon and Alanga for over twenty-five years.
Parcel in Case No. 6909:
- Purchased from Datto Bunglay with