Title
Butte vs. Manuel Uy and Sons, Inc.
Case
G.R. No. L-15499
Decision Date
Feb 28, 1962
A testamentary heir, Angela M. Butte, successfully exercised her right of legal redemption within the 30-day statutory period after a co-owner sold her 1/6 share in a co-owned property, as the redemption period began upon proper vendor notice.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-15499)

Petitioner and Respondent

Petitioner (Butte) seeks to exercise the legal right of redemption over the one-sixth share sold by co-owner Marie Gamier Vda. de Ramirez to the Respondent (Uy & Sons). Respondent resists on grounds that no such right existed or was timely exercised.

Key Dates

• October 20, 1951: Death of co-owner Jose V. Ramirez.
• December 9, 1958: Sale of Gamier’s 1/6 share to Uy & Sons for ₱500,000; letters of sale and formal notices executed.
• December 15–19, 1958: Vendor’s written notice received and forwarded to Butte.
• January 15, 1959: Butte tenders ₱500,000 and consigns the amount in court; action for legal redemption filed.
• May 13, 1959: Trial court dismisses Butte’s complaint; both parties appeal.
• February 28 and April 23, 1962: Supreme Court decision and subsequent resolution.

Applicable Law under the 1935 Constitution Framework

Civil Code (1950):
• Art. 776–777, 947, 948: Transmission of succession and heirs’ rights at the moment of decedent’s death.
• Art. 1620: Co-owners’ right to redeem another co-owner’s share sold to a third party; price adjustment if grossly excessive.
• Art. 1623: Thirty-day peremptory period to exercise legal redemption from vendor’s written notice, and affidavit requirement for registry.

Succession and Vesting of Co-ownership Rights

By virtue of Articles 776, 777, 947 and 948, heirs of Jose V. Ramirez acquired his undivided one-sixth share immediately upon his death. As co-owners of the entire property, these heirs—including Butte—held the distinct, personal right to redeem any co-owner’s share sold to a stranger. That redemption right did not form part of the decedent’s estate and thus was not affected by the appointment of a judicial administrator.

Right of Legal Redemption and Administrator’s Role

The administrator’s authority to manage decedent’s assets for debt payment does not encompass the co-owners’ independent right of redemption, which arose only upon Gamier’s sale in 1958. Since a dead person cannot acquire new rights posthumously (Art. 42, Civil Code), the redemption privilege vested exclusively in the living heirs, not in the estate under administration.

Timeliness of Redemption Notice and Tender

Under Article 1623, the thirty-day period runs from written notice by the vendor, not the buyer. Mrs. Chambers, as attorney-in-fact for Gamier, sent such notice on December 11, 1958; the administrator received it December 15, and forwarded it to Butte’s counsel on December 16. Excluding December 16 and including January 15, Butte’s tender on January 15, 1959 fell within the statutory thirty days, making her redemption timely.

Allegation of Grossly Excessive Price

Butte contended the ₱500,000 price was grossly excessive. The Court held that mere individual estimates by a single realtor do not establish gross excess under Article 1620. Absent convincing proof, the purchase price stands.

Supreme Court’s Decree

The Supreme Court reversed the trial court, holding:

  1. Butte properly tendered ₱500,000 within

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.