Title
Buenaflor Car Services, Inc. vs. David Jr.
Case
G.R. No. 222730
Decision Date
Nov 7, 2016
Service manager Cezar Durumpili David, Jr., involved in fraudulent check alterations and spurious purchase orders, was validly dismissed for serious misconduct and breach of trust.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 1523)

Facts of the Case

Cezar Durumpili David, Jr. served as the Service Manager for Buenaflor Car Services, Inc., overseeing daily operations, which included the authorization of checks, check vouchers, and purchase orders. The company's protocols involved purchase orders initiated by the Purchasing Officer, De Guzman, which required David's approval before being sent to suppliers. On August 8, 2013, a concerning report emerged regarding several checks issued by the company that included the phrase "OR CASH" after the payees' names, prompting an internal investigation. The Chief Finance Officer, Cristina S. David, alerted the firm's president about unauthorized alterations in the checks.

Investigation and Findings

The investigation revealed that Del Rosario, the Accounting Assistant, admitted to altering checks upon David's direction by inserting "OR CASH" into the existing documents. The inquiry later implicated De Guzman and another employee, Caranto, both of whom were believed to have actively participated in the scheme. Consequently, the employees faced preventive suspensions pending explanations related to their conduct connected to the issuance of a total of twenty-seven checks amounting to over P1 million.

Termination and Complaints

David denied any involvement, arguing he lacked authority over financial operations and asserting that any changes to checks should have been revealed to higher management, including Vasay and Buenaflor. Following administrative proceedings, David and his co-employees received termination notices due to alleged serious misconduct and a violation of the company's Code of Conduct. This termination led to a formal complaint for illegal dismissal to the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC).

Initial Rulings

The Labor Arbiter ruled in favor of David, declaring his dismissal illegal, primarily due to insufficient evidence of conspiracy between the employees involved. However, the NLRC later identified that while De Guzman and Caranto's terminations were substantiated, David's termination remained without cause. The NLRC affirmed this via subsequent resolutions.

Court of Appeals Decision

Upon appeal, the Court of Appeals affirmed the NLRC's decision, concluding that extrajudicial confessions by other employees regarding their actions could not be used against David due to the hearsay rule. The CA further noted the lack of evidence proving David participated in fraudulent actions, leading them to maintain his reinstatement.

Supreme Court Ruling

The Supreme Court found merit in Buenaflor Car Services' petition, emphasi

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.