Case Summary (G.R. No. 171101)
Essential Facts of the Incident
The collision occurred at approximately 11:00 PM on Calle Concepcion. At that time, the plaintiff's horse and calesa were traveling westward, while the defendant's streetcar was proceeding eastward. The calesa was navigating in the space between a garbage cart and the west-bound streetcar track. The accident happened as the horse became frightened by a flapping white tarpaulin from the garbage cart and reared, subsequently stumbling toward the streetcar.
Conflicting Testimonies
Several witnesses provided conflicting accounts of the events leading up to the accident. Mariano Alejo, the cochero (driver) of the calesa, testified that he attempted to control his frightened horse while also trying to pass the garbage cart. He asserted that he repeatedly shouted for the motorman of the streetcar to stop. Other witnesses corroborated his account to some extent, indicating that the streetcar was traveling at a high speed and the horse was agitated.
Defense's Position
The defense presented testimonies that contradicted the plaintiff's claims. Leander W. Strawn, an occupant of the calesa, stated he was partly asleep when the horse began rearing. He indicated that there was sufficient space to maneuver between the garbage cart and the streetcar, suggesting that the horse was primarily at fault, as it reared and struck the streetcar first. The motorman, Modesto Medina, affirmed that the calesa collided with the streetcar on its side, deriving from the horse's behavior just as it cleared the front end of the streetcar.
Examination of the Evidence
The court evaluated the evidence and found the testimonies of disinterested witnesses, such as Dr. Schiffbauer and Mr. Strawn, to provide a clearer understanding of the incident. Their accounts suggested that the horse had initially been under control until the attempt to pass the garbage cart, after which it became unmanageable. The evidence regarding the location where the calesa struck the streetcar indicated that the collision occurred on the side rather than head-on, which further supported the defense's position.
Legal Analysis and Judgment
The court analyzed the plaintiff's assertion of negligence on the part of the motorman claiming h
...continue readingCase Syllabus (G.R. No. 171101)
Case Background
- This case is an appeal by the plaintiff, George E. Brown, from a judgment rendered by the Court of First Instance of Manila, presided over by Hon. A. S. Crossfield, that dismissed the complaint on its merits without costs.
- The action seeks to recover damages for injuries sustained by the plaintiff's horse and calesa due to a collision with a streetcar owned by the defendant, The Manila Electric Railroad and Light Company.
- The incident occurred around 11 o'clock at night on Calle Concepcion, as the horse and calesa were traveling westward toward Bagumbayan.
Collision Details
- At the time of the accident, the calesa was maneuvering between two streetcar tracks, specifically on the left side of the street, when a streetcar turned into Concepcion from Bagumbayan, proceeding east.
- The streetcar was traveling along the east-bound track, while the calesa was situated between the west-bound track and the curb.
- The collision required the calesa to cross not only the area between the west-bound track and the curb but also the west-bound track itself to come into contact with the streetcar.
Testimonies of Key Witnesses
Mariano Alejo (Cochero):
- He was driving the calesa and testified that his horse became frightened by a tarpaulin on a refuse cart while he was attempting to pass it.
- The horse reared and shied, causing issues in control just as the streetcar rounded the corner.
- He claimed to have shouted for the motorman to stop multiple times, but the streetcar did not halt before the impact.
- His testimony indicated that the horse was facing left when struck, with the collision occurri