Title
Broadway Centrum Condominium Corp. vs. Tropical Hut Food Market, Inc.
Case
G.R. No. 79642
Decision Date
Jul 5, 1993
Broadway and Tropical Hut's 1980 lease faced disputes over rental rates. A 1982 temporary reduction agreement was deemed non-novative by the Supreme Court, upholding the original lease terms.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 187536)

Contractual Framework and Original Lease Terms

On November 28, 1980, Broadway and Tropical executed a ten‐year lease (February 1, 1981–February 1, 1991) for a 3,042.19 sqm portion of a commercial complex. The lease provided graduated monthly rentals: P120,000 (1981–1984), P140,000 (1984–1987), and P165,000 (1987–1991). It contained a non‐waiver clause preserving Broadway’s rights despite any temporary concession.

Negotiations and Provisional Rent-Reduction Agreement

In early 1982, Tropical sought rent relief, citing low sales due to a road closure. Broadway proposed a conditional P20,000 monthly reduction for four months, repayable if sales targets were met. On April 20, 1982, both parties signed a “provisional and temporary agreement” reducing rent to P60,000 or 2% of gross receipts, whichever was higher, expressly “not an amendment” of the lease and conditioned on turnover of certain leased areas and implementation of operational improvements.

Post-Agreement Correspondence and Unilateral Rent Adjustments

After the road reopened, Broadway by December 15, 1982, unilaterally proposed phased increases to P80,000 (January 1983) and P100,000 (April 1983), justifying termination of the temporary concession. Tropical repeatedly requested maintenance of the provisional rate “until recovery,” but Broadway insisted its concession was time-limited and discretionary, citing its own financial strains and the express “temporary” nature of the April 1982 agreement.

Trial Court and Court of Appeals Rulings

The Regional Trial Court (March 14, 1985) and the Court of Appeals (January 30, 1987) held that the April 20, 1982 letter constituted a partial novation of the 1980 lease, thereby permanently modifying principal conditions (leased area and rental rates). They ordered that reduced rentals remain in effect until Tropical overcame its low-sales condition, and set new rental amounts based on Tropical’s original feasibility study.

Issue on Novation and Applicable Law

Under the 1987 Constitution and Civil Code provisions on novation (Art. 1292), novation requires clear, express intent to extinguish the old obligation or new terms incompatible with the original. It is never presumed. A partial novation likewise demands evidence of unequivocal mutual consent to replace specific contractual conditions.

Supreme Court’s Analysis and Holding

  1. The April 20, 1982 agreement was expressly labeled “provisional and temporary” and “not an amendment” to the lease.
  2. The original lease’s non‐waiver clause preserved Broadway’s rights to enforce contractual terms despite any concession.
  3. Pre- and post-agreement correspondence consistently framed the rent reduction as temporary and revocable at Broadway’s discretion.
  4. There was no clear expression that the parties intended to permanently alter the principal conditions of the lease. Tropical’s reliance on its feasibility study did not transform an estimate into a binding condition.
  5. ...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.