Case Summary (A.M. No. 1765-CFI)
Charges Against Judge Moya
The primary accusation against Judge Moya centers on his issuance of an order on September 8, 1977, before the case was assigned by raffle, thus violating Supreme Court Circular No. 7 dated September 23, 1974. This circular explicitly prohibits Executive Judges from acting on incidental or interlocutory matters in cases not yet assigned to their branches. Borre contended that Judge Moya’s actions circumvented proper judicial procedure, as he acted on a case that had not been officially assigned to him. Judge Moya's explanations, stating that he merely sought to preserve the status quo to prevent irreparable harm, were deemed insufficient. The fact that no stenographic notes were taken during the supposed raffle and that he did not initial the case assignment further supported the claims against him.
Charges Against Judge Arcilla
Borre's complaint against Judge Arcilla alleges that the judge engaged in business by providing notarial services and collecting fees while serving as an ex oficio notary. Borre claimed that Arcilla, cognizant of prior sales of the land in question, acted unethically by notarizing a deed of sale executed in favor of Calvin. Judge Arcilla’s defense posited that Borre’s allegations were rooted in personal animosity stemming from ongoing legal disputes between the Borre brothers. Arcilla denied the receipt of any fees from Borre and highlighted his attempts to mediate a settlement between the brothers.
Resolution and Administrative Fine
The investigation concluded that while Judge Moya failed to comply with procedural mandates of the Supreme Co
...continue readingCase Syllabus (A.M. No. 1765-CFI)
Case Background
- Complainant: Arnaldo R. Borre
- Respondents: CFI Judge Felix L. Moya and City Judge Gumersindo Arcilla
- Nature of Complaint: Serious misconduct and grave abuse of discretion
- Date of Complaint: Filed on November 27, 1977
- Key Allegations:
- Judge Arcilla engaged in business and collected P1,400 as fees while acting as ex oficio notary.
- Allegations of cronyism between the two judges.
Details of the Case Against Judge Moya
- Initial Complaint: Filed on September 8, 1977, by Calvin R. Borre against Arnaldo R. Borre and others regarding a deed of sale.
- Judge Moya's Actions:
- Issued multiple orders without proper raffle protocol.
- Set a hearing and issued a restraining order without following Circular No. 7 prohibiting Executive Judges from acting on cases not assigned by raffle.
- Violation of Protocol:
- Failure to conduct a special raffle before acting on the case.
- Lack of stenographic records for the raffle proceedings.
- Ignoring the requirements stated in Circular No. 7 regarding the assignment of cases.
Defense by Judge Moya
- Claims of Compliance: Moya argued that he merely intended to preserve the status quo.
- Negligence Argument: Claimed oversight by his clerk as the reason for