Case Summary (G.R. No. 172776)
Nature of the Case
The petitioners appeal a decision from the Deputy Workmen's Compensation Commissioner regarding a claim for compensation filed by the respondent, Joaquin Boo. Boo claims he suffered from pulmonary tuberculosis as a result of his employment conditions, particularly exposure to heat and temperature fluctuations while working as a dryer man regulating a steam machine for desiccating coconuts.
Facts of the Case
Joaquin Boo commenced his employment with the Blue Bar Coconut Company in 1946. He reported a medical history of being physically examined upon hiring, which showed no disease. In 1948, he sustained an electric shock accident while working, for which he was compensated. By October 1951, Boo was found to be coughing blood and was subsequently laid off due to his inability to work stemming from the diagnosis of tuberculosis. The Workmen's Compensation Commission awarded him compensation and mandated ongoing medical treatment.
Findings of the Deputy Commissioner
After reviewing the case, the Deputy Workmen's Compensation Commissioner upheld the referee's decision, ordering the Blue Bar Coconut Company to pay Boo compensation but excluding the insurance carrier's liability. This ruling prompted the petitioners to file a motion for review, challenging the jurisdiction of the Deputy Commissioner to decide on the claim.
Jurisdictional Issue
The petitioners contended that the Deputy Workmen's Compensation Commissioner lacked jurisdiction, as the statute confers exclusive jurisdiction on the Workmen's Compensation Commissioner. However, the Deputy Commissioner clarified that their jurisdiction was to adjudicate claims, thereby excluding lower courts without removing the Deputy's authority.
Compensation and Cause of Disease
The petitioners argued that Boo's illness was idiopathic and not compensable. The court noted that the evidence indicated that Boo's exposure at work likely contributed to the onset of tuberculosis, asserting that the burden of proof now rested on the employer to show that the sickness resulted from factors unrelated to employment.
Medical Evidence
The medical testimony presented by Dr. Artemio Masangkay, the company's physician, indicated that Boo was initially healthy upon employment and that his work conditions caused significant stress on his body’s resistance, facilitating the development of tuberculosis. Furthermore, a report from the hospital indicated Boo suffered from advanced pulmonary tuberculosis, emphasizing that the nature of his work potentially exacerbated his health condition.
Legal Interpretation of Compensation Act
The judgment emphasized the compensability of conditions t
...continue readingCase Syllabus (G.R. No. 172776)
Case Overview
- This case involves an appeal by certiorari relating to a decision made by the Deputy Workmen's Compensation Commissioner under the Workmen's Compensation Act.
- Joaquin Boo, the respondent, filed a claim for compensation due to an illness he attributed to his employment with the Blue Bar Coconut Company, specifically pulmonary tuberculosis.
Parties Involved
- Petitioners:
- Blue Bar Coconut Company
- The Employers' Liability Assurance Corporation, Ltd.
- E. E. Elser, Inc.
- Respondent:
- Joaquin Boo
Factual Background
- Joaquin Boo was employed by the Blue Bar Coconut Company as a dryer man, responsible for regulating the pressure and temperature of a steam dryer used for desiccating coconuts.
- Boo claimed that his job exposed him to extreme temperatures, resulting in a health condition where he coughed up blood, leading to a diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis.
- After being diagnosed, Boo was laid off from work and subsequently filed a "Notice of Injury or Sickness and Claim Compensation" with the Workmen's Compensation Commission.
Initial Proceedings
- An initial decision favored Boo, ordering the petitioners to pay him compensation, medical treatment, and hospitalization costs.
- The Deputy Workmen's Compensation Commissioner upheld the referee's decision but limited the liability of the Employers' Liability Assurance Corporation, stating that only the Blue Bar Coconut Company was responsible for the compensation, albeit with a right to reimbursement from the insurance carrier.
Legal Issues
- The petitioners contended that the Deputy Workmen's Compensation C