Title
Beltran vs. Ferdez
Case
Adm. Case No. 747
Decision Date
Jun 27, 1940
A lawyer purchased disputed land from his client during ongoing litigation, violating professional ethics, leading to a six-month suspension.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 209216)

Factual Background

The complaint was initiated on January 21, 1936, when Gerardo Go Beltran alleged that Inocentes Fernandez engaged in unethical conduct by purchasing a property—specifically a parcel of land that was under dispute in litigation where he acted as legal counsel. The Singaporean Bar Association referred the complaint to the Solicitor-General, who conducted an investigation and subsequently charged Fernandez with improper conduct for purchasing the property from his client while it was still involved in pending litigation.

Proceedings and Findings

On November 30, 1939, the Court of First Instance of Oriental Misamis, which was tasked with investigating the matter, confirmed the charges against Fernandez. The court's report substantiated the claim of malpractice, echoing the Solicitor-General's recommendations for disciplinary action against the respondent. The underlying conflict began on June 13, 1928, when Honorio Pajaron and Natividad Ypan conveyed two parcels of land to Beltran, leading to a misunderstanding over the properties conveyed, particularly concerning an additional lot claimed by Beltran, which was disputed.

Conflicting Claims and Legal Representation

The disputes escalated into a series of civil and criminal cases involving Beltran and Ypan, with Fernandez representing Ypan during these proceedings. Notably, while a related criminal case was pending, Fernandez purchased the disputed lot C from his client. He maintained that the lot he acquired was distinct from those involved in the litigation.

Admission and Violations

During the investigation by the provincial fiscal, Fernandez admitted under cross-examination that the land he purchased was indeed related to the same properties in question in the ongoing litigation. This admission clearly indicated that he violated Article 1459 of the Civil Code, which prohibits a lawyer from representing conflicting interests without the consent of all parties concerned. His actions repr

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.