Case Summary (G.R. No. L-19856)
Applicable Law and Jurisdiction
The case is primarily governed by the Workmen's Compensation Act and relevant statutes, including sections that detail the jurisdiction of the Workmen's Compensation Commissioner and the enforcement of awards. The Act allows for claims by public laborers and details how employees of national and local governments may receive compensation. However, a critical aspect of the law stipulates that no execution can issue against the government under provisions of the Act.
Course of Proceedings
After being awarded compensation, Belleng sought to have the award enforced through the local court after the City Engineer's Office failed to comply with the award. The court initially rendered a judgment in favor of Belleng and ordered the issuance of a writ of execution. However, a subsequent motion from the Solicitor-General to quash the execution led the court to stay its enforcement, despite opposition from Belleng. This resulted in Belleng’s motion for reconsideration of the order denying execution, which was also unsuccessful.
Legal Interpretation and Court Findings
The court determined that while the Workmen's Compensation Act acknowledges the right of government employees to compensation, it does not waive the government's immunity from execution as outlined in Act 3083. The ruling emphasized that the state may permit itself to be sued under specific conditions and that consent does not equate to the waiver of execution rights against itself. The provisions of the Workmen's Compensation Act do not conflict with Act 3083; rather, they exist harmoniously, and the government retains protections against execution.
Remedies Technically Available to the Petitioner
The court acknowledged the difficulties faced by Belleng due to delays but concluded that his path to relief lay not within direct execution of the compensation award. Instead, it advised that claims could be processed through the Auditor-General’s Office or through the compensation guarantee fund established under section 53 of the Compensation A
...continue readingCase Syllabus (G.R. No. L-19856)
Case Citation
- 118 Phil. 854; 62 OG 7222 (October, 1966)
- G.R. No. L-19856. September 16, 1963
Parties Involved
- Petitioner and Appellant: Kindipan Belleng
- Respondents and Appellees: Republic of the Philippines (City Engineer of Baguio)
Background of the Case
- Kindipan Belleng, a laborer with over thirty years of service in the Office of the City Engineer of Baguio, suffered a snake bite that necessitated the amputation of one of his legs.
- Following the incident, Belleng filed a claim under the Workmen’s Compensation Act against the City Engineer of Baguio, documented as BWC Case No. 1516-R01.
- The claim was not contested, and an ex parte hearing was conducted, leading to a favorable ruling for Belleng on January 3, 1962.
Procedural History
- After the award was issued, Belleng requested compliance from the City Engineer’s Office on January 29, 1962, but received no response.
- Subsequently, Belleng sought enforcement of the resolution and award through the Court of First Instance of Baguio City.
- The respondents did not respond or contest the petition, and the court ruled in favor of Belleng, ordering execution to issue.
Motion to Quash Execution
- On March 29, 1962, the court, despite objections from the petitioner, granted a motion filed by the Solicitor-General to quash and