Case Summary (G.R. No. 209983)
Factual Background
Evelina E. Belarso was employed by Quality House, Inc., a company engaged in manufacturing and distributing leather goods. Over the years, she progressed within the company, eventually becoming the supervisor of the Raw Materials Warehouse in 1987. Her responsibilities included managing the storage and release of raw materials. On December 10, 2010, an incident occurred when a guard discovered a company belt buckle in Belarso’s bag during a routine inspection as she attempted to exit the premises. When confronted, she denied any wrongdoing.
Initial Proceedings
Following the discovery, Belarso was placed under preventive suspension and asked to provide an explanation regarding the incident. In her defense, she maintained that her bag was left in a visible location and asserted that she was framed by co-workers. On January 4, 2011, after a conference with management, QHI issued a Rule Violation Memo indicating that her explanation was unsatisfactory and that her employment would be terminated effective January 7, 2011, due to loss of trust and confidence.
Labor Arbiter's Ruling
The Labor Arbiter found in favor of Belarso, ruling her dismissal as illegal. The decision was based on the conclusion that it was implausible for her to attempt theft, given the frequent inspections conducted at the company exit, and expressed skepticism regarding the integrity of the evidence provided by QHI, which included multiple affidavits from guards and co-employees.
National Labor Relations Commission Ruling
On appeal, the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) reversed the Labor Arbiter’s decision, stating that QHI had established just cause for Belarso’s termination based on loss of trust and confidence. The NLRC emphasized the credibility of the evidence against her, including testimonies from security personnel and the context of her supervisory role, which inherently involved a higher standard of trust. The commission found that prior infractions further contributed to QHI’s loss of confidence in Belarso.
Court of Appeals Ruling
Belarso, unsatisfied with the NLRC’s ruling, sought relief from the Court of Appeals (CA). The CA upheld the NLRC's decision, concluding that Belarso failed to substantiate her defense of being framed and noted that her violation of the company ordinance against bringing personal bags to her workstation was significant in determining her trustworthiness. The CA affirmed the dismissal as justified based on the circumstances and supporting evidence.
Argumentation in Petition for Review
Belarso's petition to the Supreme Court raised two main issues: (1) whether there was a just cause for her termination, and (2) whether the penalty of dismissal was proportionate to any violation that may have occurred. She contested the reliability of the testimonies against her, accused of being similarly worded, and highlighted discrepancies in evidence used against her.
Supreme
...continue readingCase Syllabus (G.R. No. 209983)
Case Overview
- This case involves a petition for review on certiorari filed by Evelina E. Belarso against Quality House, Inc. (QHI) and its President and Manager, Carmelita Go, challenging the decision of the Court of Appeals which upheld the ruling of the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) that dismissed Belarso's complaint for illegal dismissal.
Background of the Case
- Evelina E. Belarso was employed by QHI since November 14, 1976, initially in the belt department and later promoted to supervisor of the Raw Materials Warehouse.
- On December 10, 2010, during a routine inspection at the QHI gate, a belt buckle belonging to the company was found in Belarso’s bag, leading to her suspension.
- Belarso was required to provide a written explanation for the incident, which she denied, asserting that the item was not hers and possibly planted by co-employees.
Incident and Initial Actions
- Following the discovery of the belt buckle, QHI placed Belarso under preventive suspension and sought her explanation.
- On December 22, 2010, Belarso requested a dialogue with Carmelita Go to present her side, which took place on January 4, 2011.
- After the conference, QHI concluded that Belarso's explanation was unsatisfactory and terminated her employment effective January 7, 2011, citing theft and loss of trust.
Proceedings Before the Labor Arbiter
- The Labor Arbiter ruled in favor of Belarso, d