Case Summary (A.M. No. P-04-1797)
Allegations and Initial Proceedings
Elsa C. Becina filed an Affidavit-Complaint dated July 3, 2003, accusing Jose A. Vivero of gross negligence and dereliction of duty concerning the handling of Civil Cases Nos. 61-64. Becina, a plaintiff in these cases, asserted that after a favorable judgment was rendered and upheld, her motion for execution filed on November 13, 2002, remained unresolved. Following the death of Presiding Judge Celestino Dicon, the motion was scheduled for a hearing on May 7, 2003, under the new presiding judge, Ramon Daomilas, Jr. However, Vivero failed to release the order related to this hearing, resulting in a protracted delay in the execution of the court's judgment, creating prejudice against the plaintiffs.
Respondent's Defense
In his Comment, Vivero acknowledged the issuance of the Order dated May 7, 2003, but provided several justifications for the delays encountered. He stated that he was on leave due to injuries from a vehicular accident around the time the order was issued and that upon his return, he was not informed by his colleagues about the status of the cases or the existence of the order. He further detailed additional leaves taken for medical reasons and a funeral, asserting that these circumstances hindered his ability to perform his official duties.
Findings by the Court Administrator
A Report dated November 17, 2003, from the Court Administrator determined that while there was undeniably a delay in the execution of the judgment, it did not amount to gross negligence. The report noted that Vivero did not deny the delay and expressed remorse for his lapses; however, it concluded that his actions suggested only simple negligence. The Administrator recognized the impact of Vivero's multiple leaves on his duties and indicated that his absence did not amount to a willful disregard of his responsibilities.
Conclusion and Court's Ruling
The Court agreed with the findings of the Court Administrator, holding Vivero guilty of simple neglect of duty, described as a failure to attend to assigned tasks due to carelessness.
...continue readingCase Syllabus (A.M. No. P-04-1797)
Case Background
- The case arises from an administrative complaint filed by Elsa C. Becina against Jose A. Vivero, Clerk of Court of the Municipal Trial Court in Aurora, Zamboanga del Sur.
- The complaint, dated July 3, 2003, accuses Vivero of gross negligence and dereliction of duty concerning the handling of Civil Cases Nos. 61, 62, 63, and 64.
- Becina, a plaintiff in these cases, reported that they received a favorable judgment which was upheld by the higher court.
- Following the entry of judgment, a motion for execution was filed on November 13, 2002, but it was not addressed until after the death of the presiding judge, Celestino Dicon.
Delay in Motion for Execution
- After a transition in judges to Ramon Daomilas, Jr., the motion for execution was finally set for hearing on May 7, 2003.
- On that date, Judge Daomilas ordered the defendant's counsel to file an opposition and the plaintiff's counsel to comment on the opposition within fifteen days.
- Despite this order, Vivero failed to release it to the parties involved, leading to significant delays in the execution of the judgment.
- The complainant discovered that the order had not been release