Title
Bataan Shipyard and Engineering Co., Inc. vs. Presidential Commission on Good Government
Case
G.R. No. 75885
Decision Date
May 27, 1987
PCGG's sequestration and takeover of BASECO upheld by SC; executive orders deemed constitutional for recovering Marcos-era ill-gotten wealth, no due process violation.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 75885)

Petitioner

BASECO, a private corporation claiming to be a legitimate shipyard and engineering company incorporated in 1972.

Respondent

Presidential Commission on Good Government (PCGG) and its Commissioners, empowered by Executive Orders Nos. 1 and 2 to sequester, freeze, and provisionally take over assets and entities allegedly tied to the Marcos regime.

Key Dates

– February 28, 1986: EO No. 1 issued.
– March 12, 1986: EO No. 2 issued.
– April 14, 1986: BASECO sequestered.
– July 14, 1986: BASECO provisionally taken over.
– May 27, 1987: Supreme Court decision.

Applicable Law

– Proclamation No. 3 (Freedom Constitution, March 25, 1986), mandating recovery of ill-gotten wealth by sequestration or freezing of assets.
– Executive Order No. 1: creation of PCGG with power to sequester, freeze, investigate, and provisionally take over enterprises allegedly owned or controlled by Marcos and associates.
– Executive Order No. 2: freeze of assets and prohibition on their transfer pending determination of ill-gotten status.
– Executive Order No. 14: mandate to file civil and criminal cases in the Sandiganbayan; allows non-strict application of technical rules in civil actions.
– 1987 Philippine Constitution, Article XVIII, Section 26 (Transitory Provisions): ratification and time limits for sequestration and freeze orders.

PCGG’s Actions and Orders

  1. Sequestration Order (April 14, 1986): directed agents to place BASECO and affiliates under PCGG control “to prevent destruction, concealment or dissipation” and ensure continuity as going concerns.
  2. Document Production (April 18, 1986): compelled submission of corporate books and records under threat of contempt.
  3. Security Contract Termination (April 21, 1986): Capt. Zabala canceled BASECO’s private security agreement and deployed military personnel.
  4. Change in Fee Collection (July 15, 1986): altered mode of payment for road-use charges at Engineer Island.
  5. Aborted Wharf Improvement Contract (July 9–30, 1986): PCGG agent entered into, then repudiated, a P210,000 improvement agreement.
  6. Quarry Operation Orders (June–September, 1986): directed and later re-delegated Mariveles quarry operations and disposal of scrap materials.
  7. Provisional Takeover (July 14, 1986): invoked EO No. 1 Section 3(c) to install a management team headed by Capt. Siacunco with broad operating powers.
  8. Termination of Executives: letters sent to BASECO officers informing them of service termination.

Petitioner’s Allegations

– EO Nos. 1 & 2, and subsequent sequestration and takeover acts, violate due process (no notice or hearing), separation of powers (PCGG not a court), absence of remedy to challenge orders, and constitute bills of attainder.
– Document request infringes rights against self-incrimination and unreasonable searches and seizures.
– PCGG unlawfully interfered with contracts and management, including security services, entry-charge contracts, quarry operation contracts, disposal of scrap, and personnel terminations.

Supreme Court’s Analysis on Provisional Remedies

Nature of Remedies: sequestration, freeze orders, and provisional takeover are provisional measures akin to attachment and receivership, meant only to conserve assets pending judicial determination of ill-gotten status.
PCGG Powers: limited to administration and conservation—collect rents, defend actions, disburse funds reasonably, enjoin dissipation, punish for contempt, and seek military support. No divestment of title until forfeiture suits are adjudicated.
Due Process Safeguards: orders issue ex parte upon prima facie showing; PCGG rules allow parties to move for lifting orders within five days, with appeal to the President within fifteen days. 1987 Constitution extends similar safeguards, requires court registration of orders, and mandates judicial actions within defined time frames.

Constitutional Sanction and Limitations

Proclamation No. 3 & Freedom Constitution: expressly authorized sequestration and freeze orders to recover ill-gotten wealth.
1987 Constitution, Section 26: ratifies these orders for up to 18 months post-ratification; requires prim



...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.