Case Summary (G.R. No. 228795)
Background and Events
BASECO is a corporate entity organized under Philippine law, with its principal office located in Port Area, Manila. Prior to the events at issue, the company filed an application with the NLRC for the retrenchment of 285 employees due to significant financial losses that began in 1979. This led to the retrenchment of employees who had been on sick leave, notably affecting those who were officers or members of the NAFLU, a labor organization registered with the Department of Labor and Employment.
NLRC Proceedings
The NLRC case, designated as NLRC Case No. RAB III-2-536-82, witnessed opposition from NAFLU representing the affected employees, who joined the case as individual complainants. The Executive Labor Arbiter ruled on January 30, 1984, declaring the retrenchment lawful but also concluding that the action was discriminatory against NAFLU members, thus constituting an unfair labor practice.
Appeals and Rulings
BASECO contested both the Executive Labor Arbiter's ruling and the findings on unfair labor practice, with the Third Division of the NLRC affirming the Arbiter's decision on December 27, 1985. The NLRC highlighted the absence of valid reasons for the specific targeting of NAFLU members for retrenchment, emphasizing management knowledge of employees' union affiliations when making such decisions.
Legal Arguments and Petition Submission
On June 10, 1987, BASECO elevated the matter to the Supreme Court via a certiorari petition, arguing that the NLRC erred in its findings of discrimination. The Office of the Solicitor General, representing the NLRC, contended that while retrenchment was legally instituted, the process must not violate principles of fair practice. The Solicitor General referenced substantial evidence indicating that union membership dictated the selection of retrenched employees and underscored the necessity for unbiased criteria in layoffs.
Examination of the Court’s Findings
Upon thorough review, the Supreme Court found merit in the allegations of discriminatory retrenchment practices by BASECO. The Court stated that while the retrenchment itself was valid, the manner of its execution must not infringe on employees' rights to due process and fair trea
...continue readingCase Syllabus (G.R. No. 228795)
Case Overview
- This case is a Petition for Certiorari under Rule 65 of the Rules of Court, filed by Bataan Shipyard & Engineering Co., Inc. (BASECO) against the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) and other respondents.
- The petitioner seeks to annul or modify the NLRC's Resolution regarding a retrenchment case involving the Company and its employees, specifically members of the National Federation of Labor Unions (NAFLU).
Parties Involved
- Petitioner: Bataan Shipyard & Engineering Co., Inc. (BASECO), a corporate entity organized under Philippine law, with its principal office located in Port Area, Manila.
- Respondents:
- National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC)
- Hon. Francisco Jose, Jr.
- Hon. Vladimir P. L. Sampang
- Jose G. Cruz
- National Federation of Labor Unions (NAFLU), a registered labor organization representing some of BASECO's employees.
Background of the Case
- BASECO applied for the retrenchment of 285 employees, citing heavy financial losses since 1979.
- The case, designated as NLRC Case No. RABIII-2-536-82, coincided with the retrenchment of employees who were on sick leave, all of whom were members of NAFLU.
- NAFLU opposed the application, asserting it represented the affected employees, who later joined the case as individual complainants.
Decisions and Findings
- Initial Ruling: On January 30, 1984, the Executive Labor Arbiter ruled that the retrenchment was legal and valid, but also found BASECO guilty of unfair labor practice