Case Summary (G.R. No. 82233)
Factual Background
JOSE BARITUA AND EDGAR BITANCOR, PETITIONERS, operated and drove respectively JB Bus No. 80 which on the evening of November 7, 1979 collided with a tricycle driven by Bienvenido Nacario along the national highway at Barangay San Cayetano, Baao, Camarines Sur. Bienvenido Nacario and his passenger died as a result of the accident, and the tricycle was damaged. No criminal prosecution ensued.
Extrajudicial Settlement and Release
On March 27, 1980 the petitioners and the bus insurer, Philippine First Insurance Company, Inc., effected an extrajudicial settlement with Alicia Baracena Vda. de Nacario, the widow of the deceased. Alicia received P18,500.00 and executed a Release Of Claim in favor of the petitioners and the insurer, releasing them from all actions, claims, and demands arising from the accident; she also executed an affidavit of desistance declaring lack of interest to institute civil or criminal proceedings.
Trial Court Proceedings
On September 2, 1981 NICOLAS NACARIO AND VICTORIA RONDA NACARIO, RESPONDENTS (the parents of the deceased) filed a complaint for damages in their personal capacity with the Court of First Instance of Camarines Sur. They alleged that the petitioners had promised to indemnify them for their son’s death, for funeral expenses, and for the damage to the tricycle, but that the petitioners instead negotiated with the estranged widow. The parents sought P25,000.00 for death, P10,000.00 for the tricycle, P25,000.00 for compensatory and exemplary damages, P5,000.00 for attorneys’ fees, and moral damages. The trial court dismissed the complaint, holding that payment by the petitioners to the widow and child, as preferred heirs and successors-in-interest, extinguished any claim against the petitioners.
Court of Appeals Ruling
The Court of Appeals reversed. It held that the widow’s release did not discharge the petitioners’ liability to the parents because the parents sued in their own capacity, not as heirs or successors of the widow, and because the widow could not validly waive damages claimed by the parents for harms she did not personally suffer. The appellate court found that the parents proved purchase of the tricycle and payment of funeral expenses and therefore awarded in their favor P10,000.00 for the tricycle, P5,000.00 for funeral services, P450.00 for a cemetery lot, P55.00 for oracion adulto, and P5,000.00 for attorneys’ fees, totaling P20,505.00. A motion for reconsideration was denied.
Issue on Review
Whether the Court of Appeals erred in holding that the petitioners remained liable to the parents in the aggregate amount of P20,505.00 despite the extrajudicial settlement and signed release executed by the widow and successor-in-interest.
Supreme Court Ruling and Disposition
The Supreme Court granted the petition. It reversed and set aside the decision of the Court of Appeals and reinstated the decision of the Regional Trial Court dismissing the complaint. Costs were assessed against the private respondents.
Legal Basis and Reasoning
The Court applied Article 1231 of the Civil Code that obligations are extinguished by payment. It found that the petitioners had paid their obligation arising from the accident by the payment made to the widow and the insurer. The Court then examined Article 1240, which provides that payment shall be made to the person in whose favor the obligation has been constituted, or to his successor in interest, or any person authorized to receive it. The Court concluded that the widow and her child were the successors in interest entitled to receive payment. The Court relied on Article 887 to show that the widow is a compulsory heir and on Article 985 to show that parents inherit only in default of legitimate children and descendants. Because Bienvenido left a surviving spouse and a child, the parents were not compulsory heirs or successors in interest of the deceased. The Court further held that mere estrangement did not disqualify the surviving spouse from inheriting. Consequently, payment to the wido
...continue reading
Case Syllabus (G.R. No. 82233)
Parties and Procedural Posture
- Jose Baritua and Edgar Bitancor were petitioners as owner and driver respectively of JB Bus No. 80 involved in the accident.
- Nicolas Nacario and Victoria Ronda Nacario were respondents as the parents of the deceased tricycle driver, Bienvenido Nacario.
- The petition sought review by certiorari of the decision of the Court of Appeals which reversed the judgment of the Regional Trial Court, Branch XXXII, Pili, Camarines Sur.
- The trial court had dismissed the complaint of the private respondents and the Court of Appeals had reinstated recovery against the petitioners in the aggregate amount of P20,505.00.
Key Facts
- On the evening of November 7, 1979, the tricycle driven by Bienvenido Nacario was involved in a collision with JB Bus No. 80 driven by petitioner Edgar Bitancor and owned by petitioner Jose Baritua.
- Bienvenido and his passenger died as a result of the accident and the tricycle was damaged.
- No criminal case arose from the incident.
- On March 27, 1980, petitioners and the bus insurer, Philippine First Insurance Company, Incorporated (PFICI), negotiated an extrajudicial settlement with Bienvenido's widow, Alicia Baracena Vda. de Nacario, who received P18,500.00.
- On the same date, Alicia executed a Release Of Claim in favor of the petitioners and PFICI and an affidavit of desistance expressing her lack of interest in instituting civil or criminal actions.
- On September 2, 1981, the private respondents, Bienvenido's parents, filed a complaint for damages with the then Court of First Instance of Camarines Sur alleging promises of indemnity by petitioners and seeking various heads of recovery.
Claims and Relief Sought
- The private respondents sought P25,000.00 for death, P10,000.00 for the damaged tricycle, P25,000.00 for compensatory and exemplary damages, P5,000.00 for attorneys' fees, and moral damages.
- The Court of Appeals awarded the private respondents P10,000.00 for the tricycle, P5,000.00 for complete funeral services, P450.00 for cemetery lot, P55.00 for oracion adulto, and P5,000.00 for attorneys' fees, totaling P20,505.00.
Procedural History
- The trial court dismissed the complaint on the ground that payment to the widow and child, as preferred heirs and successors-in-interest, extinguished any claim against the petitioners.
- The private respondents appealed to the Court of Appeals, which reversed the trial court and entered judgment in their favor.
- The petitioners filed a motion for reconsideration in the Court of Appeals, which was denied, and the petitioners thereafter elevated the case by certiorari.
Issues Presented
- Whether the extrajudicial settlement and payment to the widow, Alicia Baracena Vda. de Nacario, extinguished the petitioners' civ