Title
Bank of America, NT and SA vs. Associated Citizens Bank
Case
G.R. No. 141001
Decision Date
May 21, 2009
BA-Finance sued Miller, its sureties, and banks after checks issued "For Payee's Account Only" were deposited in a personal account. Courts held Bank of America liable for improper payment, Associated Bank for negligence, and individuals for unjust enrichment.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 141001)

Antecedent Facts

On October 6, 1978, BA-Finance entered into a credit line facility agreement with Miller, facilitated by its authorized representatives: Uy Kiat Chung, Ching Uy Seng, and Uy Chung Guan Seng. These individuals executed a Continuing Suretyship Agreement guaranteeing Miller’s debts to BA-Finance. Subsequently, Miller assigned multiple trade receivables to BA-Finance via Deeds of Assignment, leading to the issuance of four checks—drawn against Bank of America—totaling PHP 741,227.78. These checks were then deposited by Ching Uy Seng into a joint account at Associated Citizens Bank, and subsequently honored by Bank of America despite being intended solely for Miller’s use.

Legal Proceedings

After Miller defaulted on its obligation to deliver receivables to BA-Finance, BA-Finance initiated a complaint for collection against Miller and the sureties. The situation escalated with BA-Finance amending its complaint to include Bank of America for allowing the improper collection of the checks. The Regional Trial Court (RTC) ruled in favor of BA-Finance, ordering Bank of America to pay the checks’ value, with Associated Bank ordered to reimburse it, leading to appeals by both banks.

Court of Appeals' Ruling

The Court of Appeals upheld the RTC’s decision, affirming Bank of America’s liability for the payment of checks while also holding Associated Bank liable for reimbursement. However, it removed the award for attorney’s fees based on a lack of justification, providing a clear delineation of financial responsibilities among the involved parties.

Issues Presented

The key issues included whether the Court of Appeals erred in declaring Bank of America liable for the checks' value, whether Associated Bank was liable for reimbursement, and whether Ching Uy Seng and/or Uy Chung Guan Seng owed payments to Associated Bank.

Court's Ruling

The Court found the petitions unmeritorious, cementing Bank of America’s liability based on strict adherence to check payment procedures, which require checks to be paid only to the payee or endorsed to act on their behalf. The argument of gross negligence by Associated Bank was considered insufficient to absolve Bank of America of its primary liability.

Duty of the Drawee Bank

The Court reiterated the drawee bank's duty to honor checks only in accordance with the drawer's instructions reflected upon the check. The checks in question were crossed and clearly intended for deposit only by the payee, Miller. The unauthorized act of depositing the checks into a personal account constituted a breach of the drawee's obligations.

Liability of the Collecting Bank

The Court affirmed Associated Bank's liability based on its endorsement warranty as it stamped the checks with a guarantee of prior endorsements. By endorsing these checks and allowing a non-payee to deposit them, Associated Bank failed to uphold its duty of care due to negligence in the verificatio

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.