Title
Baliwag Transit, Inc. vs. Court of Appeals
Case
G.R. No. 80447
Decision Date
Jan 31, 1989
A passenger injured in a bus accident executed a Release of Claims, deemed valid by the Supreme Court, barring his parents from suing for damages.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 228107)

Allegations and Defenses

On April 10, 1985, the respondents filed their complaint, claiming damages amounting to approximately P210,000 due to George's hospitalization, which his parents financed. In response, the petitioner argued that George himself was at fault for his injuries, suggesting that he had jumped from the moving bus without warning. Furthermore, Baliwag Transit filed a Third-Party Complaint against Fortune Insurance & Surety Company for its liability insurance coverage.

Release of Claims and Court Proceedings

Subsequent to the complaint, on May 16, 1985, George executed a "Release of Claims" after receiving P8,020.50 from Fortune Insurance. This document intended to absolve both Baliwag Transit and Fortune Insurance from further liabilities related to the incident. However, both Baliwag and Fortune Insurance filed Motions to Dismiss, asserting that the Release of Claims was binding, leading to an initial denial by the Trial Court due to its timing after the Answers had been filed.

Regional Trial Court Decision

The Regional Trial Court of Bulacan dismissed the complaint, asserting that George, being of legal age, had the capacity to execute the Release of Claims, thereby discharging both Baliwag and Fortune from liability. The court maintained that, as the contract of carriage existed solely between Baliwag and George, the parents of George were not recognized as parties to the contract, thus rendering them unable to challenge the validity of the Release.

Appellate Court Ruling

On October 22, 1987, the Court of Appeals reversed the Regional Trial Court's decision, determining that the Release of Claims could not serve as a valid basis for dismissal, as it lacked the consent of George's parents, who had a financial interest due to expenses incurred for their son. The Appellate Court mandated a trial on the merits and instructed George to return the payment to Fortune Insurance.

Supreme Court Analysis

In reviewing the case, the Supreme Court emphasized the validity of the Release of Claims executed by George, noting that he had the legal capacity to act on his behalf and thus discharge any claims against the carrier. The Court further establi

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.