Title
Associated Labor Union vs. Tabigne
Case
G.R. No. L-31676
Decision Date
Sep 30, 1970
A labor union challenged a judge's order suspending a certification election and revising voter eligibility, despite a final resolution. The Supreme Court ruled the suspension improper, upholding the finality of judgments and mandatory duty to conduct elections promptly.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-31676)

Background and Procedural History

On December 28, 1966, a petition was filed by employees of the Philippine Packing Corporation seeking a certification election. The Court of Industrial Relations issued an order on January 10, 1969, mandating this election. However, subsequent to this order, the company and the union contested the eligibility list provided, citing changes in the workforce since December 31, 1966. The Court, in a resolution dated June 11, 1969, modified the basis for the eligibility list to include payrolls from December 31, 1968, alongside the earlier payrolls. The company's appeal against this resolution was dismissed for lack of merit in September 1969.

Motions Filed and Responses

Despite the court’s resolution being final and executory, the respondent union submitted a motion on February 4, 1970, requesting the inclusion and exclusion of certain employees in the eligibility list. Moreover, another motion was filed on behalf of 504 alleged employees claiming “regular and permanent status.” The petitioner opposed these motions, contending that they sought to reopen a matter that had already been conclusively decided.

Respondent Judge's Order and Legal Issues

On February 16, 1970, Judge Tabigne issued an order cancelling the scheduled election. He cited the necessity to resolve the pending motions before proceeding, claiming uncertainty regarding his jurisdiction over the motions. This order prompted the petitioner to file a writ of certiorari and prohibition to challenge the judge's decision, which delayed the election indefinitely.

The Court's Rulings on Jurisdiction

The court articulated that Judge Tabigne acted beyond his authority and jurisdiction by canceling the election and entertaining motions meant to revisit the established number of eligible voters. The industrial court had already resolved these issues in its June 11, 1969 resolution, which became final when the Supreme Court dismissed the company's appeal, rendering the eligibility list conclusive.

Legal Principles Applied

The Court emphasized that under Section 12(c) of the Industrial Peace Act (Republic Act No. 875), the conduct of elections was mandatory upon receiving a petition signed by a requisite percentage of employees. Given the extensive delays in conducting the election—which was set against years of litigation—the Court found it in

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.