Title
Aquino vs. People
Case
G.R. No. 165448
Decision Date
Jul 27, 2009
A forest ranger supervising tree cutting at Teachers' Camp was acquitted of criminal charges for overcutting; his role was deemed supervisory, not criminal.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 165448)

Petitioner

Ernesto Aquino

Respondent

People of the Philippines

Key Dates

19 May 1993 – Pre‐cut inspection conducted by CENRO and Cuteng
Permit issued by DENR Executive Director Sabado T. Batcagan with conditions
23 July 1993 – Forest rangers discover overcutting at Teachers’ Camp
26 May 1994 – Trial court decision convicting Aquino, Cuteng, Santiago
5 June 1997 – Court of Appeals decision modifying convictions
24 September 2004 – Court of Appeals resolution denying reconsideration
27 July 2009 – Supreme Court decision granting petition

Applicable Law

1987 Philippine Constitution;
Presidential Decree No. 705, Section 68 (Revised Forestry Code, as amended by E.O. No. 277, Series of 1987)

Facts

• Teachers’ Camp sought to cut 14 dead pine trees (13.37 m³) for lumber and fuel‐wood under strict conditions, including reforestation and ten-day expiry.
• Pre‐cut inspection by DENR CENRO team (including Cuteng) determined trees to be felled. Permit issued subject to volume and replacement‐planting requirements.
• On 23 July 1993, forest rangers found Aquino, Cuteng, Santiago, Masing, Salinas, and Nacatab supervising and cutting pine trees. Twenty-three stumps were observed; only twelve fell within permit coverage (13.58 m³). The rest (16.55 m³) lacked authorization (market value P182,447.20; forest charges P11,833.25).
• An information was filed charging Aquino, Cuteng, Nacatab, Masing, and Santiago with violation of Section 68, P.D. 705, for cutting nine pine trees without permit.
• Masing and Santiago testified they acted under Aquino’s supervision, unaware of permit limitations. Salinas, Cuteng, and Nacatab confirmed their roles in inspection or supervision. Aquino admitted lack of map and inability to prevent overcutting.

Trial Court Decision

• Convicted Aquino, Cuteng, and Santiago of violating Section 68, P.D. 705; sentenced each to 6 years prision correccional as minimum to 20 years reclusion temporal as maximum; indemnity of P182,477.20 and P11,833.25 jointly and severally; forfeiture of Santiago’s chainsaw.
• Acquitted Nacatab and Masing for reasonable doubt; released their cash bonds.

Court of Appeals Decision

• Acquitted Santiago and Cuteng for lack of conspiracy and absence of permit control.
• Maintained Aquino’s guilt; reduced sentence to indeterminate penalty of six years and one day prision mayor (minimum) to fourteen years, eight months, one day reclusion temporal (maximum); deleted damages and costs.
• Denied Aquino’s motion for reconsideration in 2004.

Issue

Whether Ernesto Aquino is guilty beyond reasonable doubt of violating Section 68 of P.D. 705 for unauthorized cutting or possession of forest products.

Supreme Court Ruling

• Petition meritorious. Question raised is one of law—application of Section 68 t



...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.