Title
Gregorio Anuran, Maria Maligaya, Lapaz Laro, et al. vs. Pepito Buno, Pedro Gahol, Luisa Alcantara, Guillermo Razon, et al.
Case
G.R. No. L-21353-54
Decision Date
May 20, 1966
A 1958 collision between an overloaded parked jeepney and a speeding truck caused fatalities and injuries. Courts ruled both drivers and owners liable, emphasizing the jeepney's negligence and the carrier's duty of utmost diligence under the Civil Code.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-384)

Facts of the Case

On January 12, 1958, a parked passenger jeepney was struck from behind by a speeding motor truck, leading to the deaths of three passengers and injuries to two others, necessitating hospitalization. Subsequently, lawsuits were filed in February 1958 by the representatives of the deceased and injured parties against both the truck and jeepney drivers, as well as their respective owners. At the trial court level, the jeepney driver and owners were absolved from liability, whereas the truck driver and owners were ordered to compensate the victims.

Court of Appeals Decision

The Court of Appeals reviewed the case and upheld the trial court's exoneration of the jeepney driver and owners. Although it acknowledged that the jeepney driver was at fault for improper parking—which contributed to the incident—it determined that the truck driver bore greater negligence leading to the collision. The appellate court imposed damages on the truck driver and its owners but did not hold the jeepney driver and owners liable.

Supreme Court Analysis

The Supreme Court granted a petition for review upon finding potential errors in the appellate court's judgment. It noted that the obligation of a common carrier, as stipulated in the New Civil Code, requires them to exercise utmost diligence for the safety of their passengers. The court reiterated that carriers are presumed negligent unless they prove otherwise. The jeepney driver was confirmed to be negligent for improperly parking, implying that the jeepney owners should also be held liable for the injuries incurred by their passengers.

Rationale for Joint Liability

The Supreme Court concluded that it was inequitable to exempt the jeepney driver and owners from liability solely because the truck driver was also negligent. The principle of "last clear chance" applicable in disputes between negligent drivers did not absolve the carrier's obligation toward its passengers. Thus, the jeepney driver and owners were found liable, alongside the truck driver and owners, for the damages awarded in the lower court rulings.

Conclusion on Damages

The court did not alter the damage amounts assessed against the truck driver and owne

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.