Title
Angono Medics Hospital, Inc. vs. Agabin
Case
G.R. No. 202542
Decision Date
Dec 9, 2020
Agabin, a midwife, was illegally dismissed after an approved leave. Courts ruled she’s entitled to full backwages, separation pay, and interest until the finality of the decision, rejecting AMHI’s claim of abandonment.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 202542)

Background of the Case

Antonina Q. Agabin was employed by Angono Medics Hospital, Inc. as a staff midwife on September 1, 2002, with a monthly salary of P3,500. She sought a leave of absence from June 29, 2007, to September 15, 2007, to fulfill educational requirements, which was approved by her superior. Upon returning on September 15, 2007, she was scheduled to work but faced a confrontation with the hospital's president, Andres Villamayor, who dismissed her without due process. Agabin subsequently filed a complaint for illegal dismissal and sought separation pay and backwages.

Ruling of the Executive Labor Arbiter

In the December 19, 2008 decision, the Arbiter ruled Agabin was illegally dismissed, confirming her leave was properly sanctioned and her continued employment was intended. The Arbiter ordered AMHI and Villamayor to pay Agabin full backwages, separation pay, and other benefits, recognizing Villamayor's bad faith.

National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) Ruling

The NLRC upheld the Arbiter’s ruling on December 16, 2009, confirming Agabin's illegal dismissal but limited her separation pay and backwages based on her refusal to accept an offer of reinstatement made during a January 2008 hearing. Both parties' motions for reconsideration were denied on February 26, 2010.

Court of Appeals Ruling

The Court of Appeals dismissed AMHI's appeal while reinstating the Arbiter's decision on April 27, 2012, asserting that AMHI’s offer of reinstatement lacked sufficient evidence for considering a limit on Agabin's compensation. The CA reversed NLRC's modifications about the computation of Agabin's monetary awards, stating that her separation pay was to be computed until the finality of her decision.

Res Judicata Argument

AMHI contended that the prior ruling in SP No. 113939 functioned as res judicata against the subsequent case, asserting both shared identical parties, subjects, and causes. Agabin countered that the legal issues were distinct and the focus of SP No. 114001 was solely on the computation of monetary awards, making the cases not conclusively adjudicated together.

Supreme Court Decision

The Supreme Court found AMHI's petition unmeritorious, upholding that the decisions concerning Agabin’s illegal dismissal were final and executory. It clarified that the computation of her awards remained open for determination despite AMHI's claims of res judicata; that only the finding of illegal dismissal was settled. The Court reiterated the principles surrounding full backwages and separation pay — that backwages should be calculated from the mome

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.