Title
Angelia vs. Commission on Elections
Case
G.R. No. 135468
Decision Date
May 31, 2000
Election dispute over vote discrepancies in Abuyog, Leyte; COMELEC annulled proclamation due to manifest errors, ordered correction, and affirmed Tan's win after due process concerns.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 135468)

Election Results and Initial Proceedings

Following the elections, on May 13, 1998, the Municipal Board of Canvassers proclaimed the duly elected members of the Sangguniang Bayan, with Angelia receiving 7,765 votes, placing him in eighth position, while Tan received 7,761 votes, ranking him ninth. Tan subsequently filed a petition for quo warranto on May 25, 1998, arguing that election returns inaccurately credited him with fewer votes and inaccurately counted Angelia’s votes.

COMELEC's Annulment of Proclamation

On June 12, 1998, Angelia took his oath of office. Meanwhile, Tan withdrew his quo warranto case and later filed a petition with the COMELEC on June 23, 1998. Tan's evidence included affidavits from poll clerks and voters that supported his claims of vote miscounting. On August 18, 1998, the COMELEC ruled in favor of Tan, annulling Angelia’s proclamation and ordering the Municipal Board of Canvassers to correct the election returns and proclaim the winning candidates accordingly.

Procedural Issues and Petition for Certiorari

Angelia contended that the COMELEC violated his constitutional right to due process by issuing the annulment without prior notice and hearing, as per his petition for certiorari. He subsequently filed this petition with the Supreme Court, asserting that the announcement of the COMELEC was premature as he had filed a motion for reconsideration.

Examination of Legal Procedures

The Supreme Court held that Angelia’s petition was properly filed as the COMELEC’s resolution was not open for reconsideration, thus requiring Angelia to pursue certiorari directly. The Court addressed procedural fairness and concluded that while the COMELEC's failure to provide notice and hearing was a procedural misstep, the identification of manifest errors warranted a re-examination of the election returns without a full trial.

Manifest Errors in Election Returns

The discrepancies in the election returns, as highlighted by the evidentiary submissions, included Tan being credited with 82 votes rather than the correct 92, and Angelia being credited with 18 votes rather than 13. Based on the COMELEC Resolution No. 2962, which established that the tally in the “taras” or tally prevailed over the written totals, the Supreme Court found that the errors discovered were manifest and corrected through administrative actions without necessitating the opening of ballot boxes.

Supreme Court Decision and Modifications

The Supreme Court affirmed the COMELEC's August 18 resolution with modifications. It explicitly directed the Municipal Board of Canvassers to reconvene with due

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.