Title
Supreme Court
Angeles University Foundation vs. City of Angeles
Case
G.R. No. 189999
Decision Date
Jun 27, 2012
AUF, a non-profit educational foundation, sought exemption from building permit fees and real property taxes. SC ruled fees are regulatory, not taxes, and denied exemption, affirming CA's decision.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 189999)

Petitioner

Established in 1962 and converted into a non-stock, non-profit educational foundation under R.A. No. 6055 in 1975, AUF operates an educational campus in Angeles City, Pampanga.

Respondents

The City Treasurer and the Acting City Building Official of Angeles City responsible for assessing and collecting building permit, locational clearance, fire code, electrical, sanitary and real property taxes.

Key Dates

• August 2005: AUF applied for an 11-storey medical center building permit.
• November 15, 2005: AUF claimed exemption citing DOJ opinions.
• December 6, 2005: DOJ, through Secretary Gonzalez, affirmed exemption opinions.
• June 2006: AUF paid under protest ₱826,662.99.
• September 21, 2007: Trial court ruled in favor of AUF.
• July 28, 2009: Court of Appeals reversed.
• June 27, 2012: Supreme Court decision under the 1987 Constitution.

Applicable Law

• R.A. No. 6055 (conversion of educational corporations)
• P.D. No. 1096 (National Building Code)
• Local Government Code of 1991 (R.A. No. 7160)
• 1987 Philippine Constitution, Art. VI, Sec. 28(3) on real property tax exemption

Factual Background

AUF filed for a building permit and locational clearance in August 2005. City offices assessed fees totaling P126,839.20 (building permit), P238,741.64 (locational clearance), and later P645,906.84 (including fire, electrical) plus P130,930.64 in real property taxes. AUF sought exemption based on earlier DOJ opinions and previous permit issuances in 2000 and 2004. The City refused and AUF paid under protest.

Procedural History

AUF’s request for refund was denied. In August 2006, it filed a complaint for refund plus interest and attorney’s fees. The trial court granted exemption and ordered refund with interest. The Court of Appeals reversed, holding that building permit fees are regulatory, not taxes, and AUF’s property was not “actually, directly and exclusively” used for educational purposes. AUF then petitioned the Supreme Court.

Issues Presented

  1. Whether AUF is exempt from payment of building permit and related fees under R.A. No. 6055.
  2. Whether AUF’s land occupied by informal settlers is exempt from real property tax under the Constitution.

Exemption from Building Permit Fees

R.A. No. 6055, Sec. 8, exempts the Foundation from “all taxes, import duties, assessments, and other charges imposed by the Government on … property used exclusively for the educational activities of the Foundation.” The National Building Code, however, imposes building permit fees as regulatory charges under police power, not taxes on property. Only public buildings and traditional indigenous dwellings are expressly exempt.

Regulatory Nature vs. Tax Character

A building permit fee is assessed to regulate construction and ensure compliance with safety, zoning, sanitation, structural and environmental standards. The Implementing Rules prescribe fee bases—character of occupancy, cost of construction, floor area, height—reflecting regulation, not revenue-raising. AUF failed to prove fees were arbitrary or exceeded regulatio

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.