Title
American Foreign Banking Corp. vs. Herridge
Case
G.R. No. 21005
Decision Date
Dec 20, 1924
A 1920 quedan for 560 bales of tobacco, endorsed to AFBC as security, was upheld as valid despite a discrepancy in origin (Cagayan vs. Isabela), affirming AFBC's superior title.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 21005)

Relevant Facts

On April 28, 1920, De Poli issued a warehouse receipt, known as a 'quedan,' for 560 bales of Cagayan tobacco. He certified that he was the sole owner of the merchandise described. This quedan was endorsed in blank to the American Foreign Banking Corporation as collateral for an overdraft of around P40,000. The bank later moved for the return of the tobacco upon surrendering the original warehouse receipt.

Dispute Over Ownership

The assignee and general creditors contended that the tobacco specified in the quedan was not in their possession and questioned whether the receipt constituted a negotiable warehouse receipt under the Warehouse Receipt Act. They claimed that the quedan was merely a security instrument and thus ineffective against other creditors of the insolvent estate. The main defenses revolved around whether the tobacco was still owned by De Poli and the validity of the description in the quedan.

Evidence Presented

The evidence demonstrated that the tobacco was indeed stored in the warehouse when the quedan was issued. However, there was a significant discrepancy in the number of bales, with only 530 bales present rather than the 560 indicated. Also, the tobacco identified was described as Isabela tobacco, while the quedan referred to it as Cagayan tobacco. De Poli testified regarding the quality grading and claimed that the distinction between the tobacco types was not critical for the transaction.

Legal Considerations

The court addressed the legal sufficiency of the warehouse receipt. It determined that even with the discrepancies in the description, the intent behind the transaction was clear, and the receipt did indeed represent a negotiable instrument. This determination was informed by precedent from the Felisa Roman case, where similar warehouse receipts were upheld. The court noted that the intention of the parties should prevail over technical objections concerning descriptions.

Decision and Order

The court found no reversible error in the decisions made at the lower courts and ruled in favor of the American Foreign Banking Corporation, affirming that the

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.