Title
Alvarez vs. Guingona, Jr.
Case
G.R. No. 118303
Decision Date
Jan 31, 1996
Petitioners challenged RA 7720, converting Santiago into a city, arguing improper origination and income requirements. SC upheld constitutionality, ruling IRAs count as income and legislative process complied.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 118303)

Origination Requirement under the 1987 Constitution

• Constitutional Mandate: Bills of local application must originate exclusively in the House of Representatives.
• Petitioners’ Argument: Passage of SB No. 1243 in the Senate shows the law did not originate exclusively in the House.
• Court’s Analysis: HB No. 8817 was filed on April 18, 1993, whereas SB No. 1243 was filed only on May 19, 1993. The House bill initiated the legislative process and was approved on Third Reading before Senate action. The Senate’s filing of a counterpart bill in anticipation does not violate the exclusivity rule, so long as it refrains from taking final action until it receives the House bill (Tolentino v. Secretary of Finance). No breach of Article VI, Section 24 occurred.

Presumption of Constitutionality

• General Rule: Every law enjoys a presumption of constitutionality, which can be overcome onl


...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.