Title
Allied Banking Corp. vs. Sia
Case
G.R. No. 195341
Decision Date
Aug 28, 2019
Elizabeth Sia sued Allied Bank for freezing her account after her father’s death. The Supreme Court ruled the bank acted lawfully under tax laws, dismissing her claims for breach of contract and damages.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 195341)

Background of the Case

Elizabeth Sia maintained two accounts with Orient Commercial Banking Corporation, one of which was a joint "and/or" account with her father, See Sia. When the bank closed, there were uninsured deposits of over P5 million. Allied Bank assumed these liabilities with the help of the Philippine Deposit Insurance Corporation (PDIC). Subsequently, Elizabeth was authorized by her father to claim these deposits. They executed a Deed of Assignment in which a portion of the claims was assigned to Allied Bank with stipulations on payment. However, after Elizabeth’s father died, Allied Bank froze the account upon receiving notice from the heirs, prompting Elizabeth to file a suit for specific performance, breach of contract, and damages.

Proceedings and Decisions

The Regional Trial Court (RTC) ruled in favor of Elizabeth, highlighting that the account was under her name alone and directing Allied Bank to release the funds. The Court of Appeals (CA) affirmed this but reduced the damages awarded, recognizing that while the money in the account was derived from both Elizabeth and her father's contributions, the account was strictly in Elizabeth's name.

Legal Issues

The primary legal issue centered on whether Allied Bank had the legal basis to temporarily freeze the account upon knowledge of See Sia's death. Allied Bank contended that the funds in the account belonged partly to See and, thus, had proper grounds to act on the withdrawal request based on estate tax considerations.

Court Analysis

The Supreme Court noted that resolution of the case involved a question of law rather than fact, as underlying facts were not disputed. The bank's authority to freeze the account was established under R.A. No. 8424. The Court stated that a bank must refrain from allowing withdrawals upon knowledge of a depositor's death to ensure estate tax obligations are met. Thi

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.