Title
Alitagtag vs. Garcia
Case
A.C. No. 4738
Decision Date
Feb 6, 2002
Atty. Virgilio Garcia disbarred for falsifying a deed, violating notarial duties, and perpetuating fraud, harming the lawful heirs of Cesar Flores.

Case Summary (A.C. No. 4738)

Factual Background

Cesar B. Flores, the alleged donor, was related to the respondent through his marriage to Maria Eugenia Gamad Flores, the respondent’s wife. The deed of donation, which is under scrutiny, purportedly transferred ownership of the land from Cesar to Gregorio Gamad Flores, with Atty. Virgilio Garcia involved as the notary public. The involved parties are closely related, and the legal implications of this relationship are significant.

Findings of the Investigating Commissioner

The Investigating Commissioner of the Integrated Bar of the Philippines found that the signature on the deed of donation did not match the standard signatures of Cesar B. Flores, as confirmed by a forensic examination conducted by the PNP Crime Laboratory. The Regional Trial Court of Pasig subsequently ruled in Civil Case No. 65883 that the deed of donation was falsified and declared it null and void. This ruling contradicted the opinion of the Investigating Commissioner, who recommended dismissal of the charges against Atty. Garcia.

Disciplinary Recommendations

While the Investigating Commissioner suggested dismissal of the case, the Integrated Bar of the Philippines decided to impose a suspension of two years instead. Nevertheless, the reviewing body perceived the recommended penalty as insufficient given the severity of the misconduct.

Legal Obligations of a Notary Public

Act 2103, Section 1 specifies that a notary public must ensure that the person acknowledging the document is indeed the signatory and that the acknowledgment reflects the individual's free act and deed. Respondent Garcia's actions in notarizing a falsified document constituted a blatant disregard for this obligation, which is central to ensuring the integrity of legal documents.

Respondent's Defense

Respondent Garcia argued that the deed was authentic and that he merely assisted his father-in-law in its execution. However, the evidence contradicted this claim, particularly given the forensic analysis and the lack of a submitted copy of the notarized document to the Office of the Clerk of Court in Pasig City, a requirement for notaries.

Negligence in Notarial Duties

Garcia's rationale regarding the missing copy was dismissed as trivial. The Court emphasized that the responsibility to retain certified copies of notarized documents falls squarely on the notary public, and he cannot delegate this responsibility to subordinates or clients.

Active Participation in Fraud

Atty. Virgilio Garcia was appointed attorney-in-fact for Gregorio Flores, the donee, which put him in a pivotal role regarding the property. His actions demonstrated an intent to benefit personally from the fraudulent deed. The ongoing negotiations to sell the property further illustrated his involvement in fraudulent activities designed to deceive other parties.

Professional Responsibility of Lawyers

As a lawyer, Garcia bore a more significant responsibility, dictated by his oath to uphold the law and avoid deceitful conduct. The Court highlighted that both legal and ethical obligations bind a lawy

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.