Title
Alisangco vs. Tabiliran, Jr.
Case
A.M. No. MTJ-91-554
Decision Date
Jun 30, 1993
Judge Tabiliran fined for ignorance of law, abuse of authority, and improper arrest order despite waiver of preliminary investigation.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 218009)

Allegations and Facts

The complaint arises from a legal proceeding in Criminal Case No. 147, wherein Alisangco was implicated as an accused after an amended complaint was filed by the Station Commander of Jose Dalman for a violation of Presidential Decree (P.D.) No. 533. The judge purportedly issued an arrest warrant for Alisangco without a prior determination of his involvement in the crime, setting an excessive bond of P 20,000. Alisangco argues that this amount is disproportionate, as the carabao’s value at issue was only P 7,000. After posting a cash bond with the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Dipolog City, Alisangco failed to appear in court for arraignment on February 21, 1991, having previously filed a waiver of preliminary investigation.

Court Proceedings and Responses

Following Alisangco's non-appearance, Judge Tabiliran issued an order for his arrest and demanded that Alisangco show cause for the confiscation of his bond. A legal intervention occurred when Alisangco's counsel filed a motion to lift the arrest order, which the respondent failed to act upon. In January 1992, the respondent judge refuted the allegations against him, claiming that proper procedure was followed, and that the issuing of the arrest warrant was justified. The judge also stated that the bond set was appropriate given the seriousness of the charges.

Investigative Findings

An investigation requested by the Supreme Court was conducted by Executive Judge Jesus O. Angeles, who interviewed court personnel involved in the preliminary investigation. The investigative findings indicated that contrary to the respondent's assertions, Alisangco’s waiver was indeed filed in time, directly contradicting the respondent’s claims about the procedural correctness of issuing an arrest warrant.

Legal Analysis of Respondent's Conduct

The Office of the Court Administrator concluded that the right to a preliminary investigation is a personal right that may be waived by a defendant. Moreover, it was determined that Judge Tabilir

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.