Title
Alejo vs. People
Case
G.R. No. 173360
Decision Date
Mar 28, 2008
A military officer was convicted of malversation for misappropriating confiscated logs, deemed public property, by ordering their delivery to his residence, affirmed by the Supreme Court.
Font Size:

Case Summary (G.R. No. 150454)

Background of the Case

  • Lt. Col. Pacifico G. Alejo was charged with Malversation of Public Property under Article 217 of the Revised Penal Code.
  • The charge stemmed from an incident on June 8, 1992, where Alejo allegedly misappropriated 1,000 board feet of confiscated logs valued at P20,000.00.
  • Alejo was the Commanding Officer of the Real Estate Preservation Economic Welfare Center (REPEWC) and had control over confiscated illegal logs.

Trial Proceedings

  • Alejo pleaded not guilty during his arraignment on November 22, 1995.
  • The Regional Trial Court (RTC) allowed a joint trial for the malversation case and two other charges: Direct Bribery and Violation of Republic Act No. 3019.
  • The prosecution presented several witnesses, including subordinates of Alejo, who testified about the delivery of logs to Alejo's residence.

Prosecution's Evidence

  • Witnesses included Colonel Gerardo Lantoria, Lieutenant Rodolfo Estremos, Sergeant Nelson Flores, and Amrodin Sultan.
  • Testimonies established that Alejo ordered the confiscated logs to be taken to his home.
  • The prosecution relied on a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) between the DENR and the 7th Infantry Division, which outlined the military's role in confiscating illegal logs.

Defense's Argument

  • Alejo denied the allegations, claiming intimidation of witnesses and asserting that they had recanted their statements.
  • The defense presented evidence of commendation for Alejo's efforts against illegal logging.
  • The defense argued that Alejo was not an accountable officer for the logs and that the prosecution failed to prove the logs' existence and value.

RTC Decision

  • On July 26, 2002, the RTC acquitted Alejo of Direct Bribery and Violation of RA 3019 but convicted him of Malversation.
  • The RTC sentenced Alejo to imprisonment of 8 years and 1 day to 17 years, along with a fine of P20,000.00.

Motion for Reconsideration

  • Alejo filed a motion for reconsideration, arguing that he was not an accountable officer.
  • The RTC reopened the case for additional evidence, but ultimately reaffirmed its conviction on October 2, 2003.

Sandiganbayan Ruling

  • Alejo appealed to the Sandiganbayan, which affirmed the RTC's decision on January 31, 2006.
  • The Sandiganbayan modified the penalty to 10 years and 1 day of prision mayor as minimum, to 16 years, 5 months, and 11 days of reclusion temporal as maximum.

Petitioner’s Arguments on Appeal

  • Alejo contended that the prosecution did not prove his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • He highlighted inconsistencies in witness testimonies and the lack of documentary evidence regarding the logs.
  • Alejo maintained that he could not be considered an "accountable officer" under Article 217.

Court's Analysis of Evidence

  • The Court emphasized that the credibility of witnesses is primarily assessed by the trial court.
  • The prosecution's evidence, including witness testimonies, was deemed sufficient to establish the elements of malversation.
  • The Court noted that the logs w...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.