Title
Alegre vs. Insular Collector of Customs
Case
G.R. No. 30783
Decision Date
Aug 27, 1929
The court upheld the constitutionality of Act No. 2380, ruling that the Fiber Standardization Board’s administrative powers to enforce fiber grading and baling standards did not constitute an unconstitutional delegation of legislative authority.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 251816)

Applicable Law

Act No. 2380, enacted on February 28, 1914, delineates regulations governing the inspection, grading, and baling of various fibers. This includes definitions of relevant terms and the establishment of grading standards by the Director of Agriculture. Subsequent laws, including provisions within the Administrative Code, further implement these regulations.

Legislative Intent and Structure of Act No. 2380

The core objective of Act No. 2380 was to formalize a system for the inspection, grading, and baling of fibers, creating uniform standards intended to facilitate commerce by guaranteeing quality. Provisions allowed for the establishment of grading permits, mandatory compliance with grading standards, and an elaborate process for inspection and certification prior to exportation.

Administrative Code Amendments

Following the enactment of Act No. 2380, amendments incorporated its principles into the Administrative Code. Notably, section 1244 establishes that only fibers conforming to the Director of Agriculture's standards may be loaded for export, thus reinforcing compliance with grading standards.

Creation and Function of the Fiber Standardization Board

The legislation stipulated the creation of the Fiber Standardization Board, which was tasked with determining the official commercial grades of Philippine fibers and ensuring adherence to these standards. This Board, chaired by the Director of Agriculture, comprised representatives from various sectors of the fiber industry.

Delegation of Authority and Legislative Power

A critical issue discussed was whether the empowerment of the Fiber Standardization Board constituted an unconstitutional delegation of legislative power. The Court differentiated between the delegation of legislative authority and the assignment of administrative functions, concluding that the law preserved the legislative policy while facilitating its execution through an administrative body.

Judicial Precedents and Constitutional Interpretation

Judicial precedents, notably Buttfield v. Stranahan, were analyzed to clarify the scope of permissible delegation of authority. The Court reasoned that such delegations are acceptable as long as they relate to the execution of legislative intent, which was

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.