Title
Alde vs. City of Zamboanga
Case
G.R. No. 214981
Decision Date
Nov 4, 2020
Petitioner Eulogio Alde sought to lease public lands in Zamboanga City. Opposition arose over jurisdiction, public use, and procedural compliance. SC upheld DENR’s authority, ruled administrative action sufficed, and found substantial compliance with posting/publication. Lease valid.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 214981)

Key Dates and Administrative Milestones

MLA filed: February 9, 2001. Appraisal ordered: May 14, 2002; appraised value reported May 17, 2002. Notice of lease publication and posting occurred in 2002 (Official Gazette and local newspaper). Order of Award issued by RED-DENR Region IX: July 2, 2003. DENR Secretary decision denying the City’s opposition: May 27, 2007; motion for reconsideration denied July 29, 2009 (pro forma). OP affirmed DENR: June 18, 2010 (decision) and March 1, 2011 (resolution). CA reversed OP and DENR: February 27, 2014 (decision) and denied reconsideration September 26, 2014. SC decision granting petition: November 4, 2020.

Factual Background and Appraisal Findings

Alde applied for a lease covering two titled parcels of public domain land. The Appraisal Committee classified the lots as commercial and appraised the land at P6,800.00 per sq. m. (total P6,475,000.00 for 805 sq. m.), and set the minimum annual rental at P174,250.00 (three percent of land value plus one percent of proposed improvements under Section 37 of CA No. 141). Bidding procedures were undertaken; Alde was the lone bidder and paid ten percent of the bid price.

Administrative Processing, Notices and Government Inputs

The RED of DENR-Region IX approved the appraisal and authorized leasing under the Public Land Act. The Office of the Regional Executive Director referred to the DPWH to determine public-use need; DPWH interposed no objection subject to reservation of a 4.0 m strip for future road widening. Notices of lease were published and posted as documented by a Certificate of Publication and a publisher’s affidavit. The City of Zamboanga raised objections—initially by letter and later by a verified opposition filed administratively with DENR Regional Office IX—alleging need for the lots for public use and non-compliance with posting/publication requirements.

Administrative Findings and Executive Review

An investigative committee recommended dismissing the City’s opposition and giving Alde’s MLA due course. The DENR Secretary, applying the Public Land Act’s appraisal and rental rules, denied the City’s opposition and validated the bidding and award. The Office of the President affirmed the DENR decision, concluding the lots were commercially classified, fell within the Public Land Act’s disposables (Section 59(d)), and that a declaration of non-necessity for public service was not a prerequisite for disposal of lands under that paragraph.

Issues Raised Before the Court of Appeals

The City sought judicial review alleging: (1) the Public Land Act’s disposal regime should not apply to lands already titled in the name of the Republic; and (2) the DENR Regional Office lacked authority to entertain the MLA for already-titled lands. The CA also assessed whether a presidential proclamation was required and whether publication/posting requirements of CA 141 were satisfied.

Court of Appeals Decision and Reasoning

The CA reversed the OP, DENR and the Order of Award and declared the award void for lack or excess of jurisdiction. The CA held that disposals under CA 141 require a prior presidential proclamation that the land is not necessary for public service, including lands classified under Section 59(d). It relied on a textual reading of Sections 61 and 63 of CA 141, emphasizing prior proclamations in historical practice and concluding that the publication requirements under Section 24/34 of CA 141 were not fully complied with.

Supreme Court: Threshold Legal Principle on Disposition of Public Lands

The Supreme Court agreed that lands enumerated in Section 59, including subsection (d), must be established as unnecessary for public use before disposition. However, the Court rejected the CA’s categorical requirement that such establishment must take the specific form of a presidential proclamation. The SC construed the word “decided” in Section 63 to admit alternative forms of the requisite governmental determination, so long as a definite opinion or judgment is rendered that the land is not needed for public purposes.

Supreme Court: Administrative Action as Valid Presidential Declaration

The SC held that the required presidential declaration may be effected through various executive instruments, including executive orders, administrative actions, investigative reports, or legislative acts. In the present case, the OP — upon recommendation of the DENR Secretary — effectively declared the subject lots disposable by issuing an administrative determination that functioned as the required declaration. This administrative mode falls within recognized alternatives to a formal presidential proclamation.

Supreme Court: Publication and Posting Compliance

The SC found substantial compliance with the statutory publication/posting requirements. The record included a Certificate of Publication showing six consecutive weekly publications in the Official Gazette (dates specified) and an affidavit evidencing three consecutive weekly publications in the provincial newspaper. Consequently, the CA’s finding that statutory notice was not properly given was

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.