Title
Albano-Sales vs. Sales
Case
G.R. No. 174803
Decision Date
Jul 13, 2009
A marriage declared void ab initio led to disputes over property division; RTC granted partition without hearing, violating due process. CA remanded for evidence reception.
Font Size:

Case Summary (G.R. No. 174803)

Background of the Case

  • The petition for review challenges the Court of Appeals' Decision dated July 26, 2006.
  • The case involves two consolidated civil cases: one filed by Marywin Albano Sales for the dissolution of the conjugal partnership and separation of properties, and another filed by Mayor Reynolan T. Sales for the declaration of nullity of their marriage.
  • The Regional Trial Court (RTC) ruled on January 4, 2000, declaring the marriage void due to mutual psychological incapacity and ordering the dissolution of their conjugal partnership.

RTC's Initial Ruling

  • The RTC's decision included directives for the liquidation and distribution of common properties and shared expenses for their child.
  • Following the finality of the RTC decision, Marywin filed a motion for execution and proposed a partition of their assets, which was opposed by Reynolan.

Reynolan's Opposition and RTC Hearings

  • Reynolan contested the motion, asserting that the RTC's decision lacked specificity regarding the properties and claimed that Marywin had no rightful share.
  • The RTC scheduled hearings to address the claims, but several were postponed, and Marywin filed a reiterative motion for execution.

RTC's Approval of Partition

  • On November 28, 2003, the RTC approved Marywin's proposed partition in Reynolan's absence, leading to Reynolan's subsequent motion for reconsideration.
  • Reynolan argued that the RTC's approval preempted unresolved issues regarding property relations and alleged fraudulent activities by Marywin.

Court of Appeals' Decision

  • The Court of Appeals ruled in favor of Reynolan, setting aside the RTC's orders and remanding the case for further hearings.
  • The appellate court emphasized the importance of due process and the need for a hearing to address the factual issues raised by Reynolan.

Legal Issues Raised by the Parties

  • Petitioner contended that the Court of Appeals exceeded its jurisdiction by entertaining the appeal and argued that due process was not violated.
  • Respondent maintained that the RTC should not have granted the partition without a hearing, citing unresolved issues regarding property accounting and alleged misappropriation by Marywin.

Supreme Court's Ruling

  • The Supreme Court affirmed the Court of Appeals' d...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.