Title
Air France vs. Gillego
Case
G.R. No. 165266
Decision Date
Dec 15, 2010
Congressman Gillego's luggage lost by Air France during a conference trip led to claims of moral and exemplary damages. Courts found Air France negligent and in bad faith, but SC reduced excessive awards.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 84628)

Background and Facts

In April 1993, Gillego, the then Congressman of the Second District of Sorsogon, was invited to speak at the 89th Inter-Parliamentary Conference in Budapest, Hungary, and Tokyo, Japan. He departed from Manila on May 16, 1993, traveling via Air France. Upon arrival in Paris on May 17, he had a layover before his connecting flight to Budapest. While at the De Gaulle International Airport, he arranged to change to an earlier flight to Budapest. Upon arrival, however, he found that his checked-in luggage was missing.

Attempts to Recover Lost Luggage

Gillego sought assistance from Air France personnel at the airport, who confirmed that his luggage was checked in but failed to deliver it. Despite their assurance that the luggage would be delivered to his hotel later that day, it never arrived. Gillego was left without his personal belongings, including medication for hypertension, clothing, and materials needed for his speech at the conference. Consequently, he incurred expenses amounting to approximately $1,000 for necessities during his stay.

Legal Action

Following his return to the Philippines, Gillego filed a complaint against Air France on July 13, 1993, asking for damages due to the airline's negligence in handling his luggage. He asserted that as a common carrier, Air France was obligated to exercise extraordinary diligence regarding checked-in luggage. Gillego's claim detailed actual damages, moral damages, exemplary damages, and attorney's fees, primarily based on the distress and physical strain incurred due to the airline's failure to deliver his belongings.

Air France's Defense

Air France acknowledged the issuance of tickets and the luggage issue but contended that its liability for lost luggage was governed by the Warsaw Convention, which limits compensation for lost baggage to a certain amount. The airline denied any wrongdoing, arguing that the loss was a result of force majeure and that they had exercised due diligence in attempting to locate the missing luggage.

Trial Court's Decision

The Regional Trial Court rendered a decision on January 3, 1996, in favor of Gillego, citing Air France’s gross negligence and willful misconduct for failing to return the luggage during the significant time leading up to trial. The court awarded Gillego P1,000,000 in moral damages, P500,000 in exemplary damages, and P50,000 in attorney's fees, marking a clear departure from the airline's defenses under the Warsaw Convention.

Court of Appeals Ruling

Air France appealed to the Court of Appeals, which upheld the trial court’s decision. The appellate court noted the unreasonable delay and lack of proper justification from Air France for the mishandling of Gillego's luggage, further supporting the finding of gross negligence and bad faith on the airline's part.

Supreme Court Review

In subsequent petitions, Air France contested the amounts awarded, claiming they were excessive and lacked a factual basis in the trial court's findings. The airline argued that Gillego's difficulties did not justify such high damages and emphasized that he ultimately delivered his speech at the conference, thus diminishing the impact of the luggage

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.