Title
Air France vs. Court of Appeals
Case
G.R. No. L-57339
Decision Date
Dec 29, 1983
The GANAS purchased open-dated tickets from AIR FRANCE, which expired on May 8, 1971. Despite warnings, they attempted to use expired tickets, leading to denied flights and additional costs. The Supreme Court ruled AIR FRANCE did not breach the contract, as the GANAS were informed of the expiration and failed to pay required fare adjustments.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 104234)

Facts and Transaction Background

The late Jose G. Gana and his family purchased nine open-dated Air France air passage tickets for the Manila/Osaka/Tokyo/Manila route, with payment made in U.S. dollars converted at prevailing rates and additional travel taxes paid. The tickets were valid until May 8, 1971. Before traveling, the GANAS sought an extension of the ticket validity as their travel was not completed by the expiry date. This request was denied by Air France unless fare differentials and additional taxes, arising from exchange rate changes and fare increases authorized by the Civil Aeronautics Board (CAB), were paid. Despite warnings that their tickets would expire and not be honored beyond May 8, 1971, the GANAS decided to commence travel on May 7, 1971. Without Air France’s authorization, their travel agent affixed validating stickers for the Osaka/Tokyo segment, which were not recognized by the airlines. Consequently, Japan Airlines and Air France refused to honor the return or onward segments, necessitating the purchase of new tickets or payment of additional fare costs to complete the journey.

Procedural History

The GANAS filed a complaint for damages before the Court of First Instance for breach of contract of carriage, which was dismissed on May 29, 1975. Upon appeal, the Court of Appeals reversed the dismissal and awarded the respondents moral damages of P90,000.00. Air France sought reconsideration, which was denied, prompting a petition for review on certiorari to the Supreme Court.

Issues Presented

Whether Air France breached its contract of carriage by refusing to honor the tickets beyond their validity date and requiring the payment of additional fare differentials and taxes; and whether the validation of tickets by the travel agent without Air France’s consent could bind the airline.

Analysis of the Ticket Validity and Fare Adjustment Rules

The Supreme Court emphasized the IATA tariff rules and regulations governing the validity of airfare tickets, particularly:

  • A ticket is valid for one year from the commencement date of the journey. Passengers must begin and complete their trip within this time frame.
  • If the ticket expires before the trip is completed, it is invalid and cannot be used to travel; a new ticket must be purchased to cover remaining segments.
  • Fare adjustments are applicable based on the fare in effect on the date transportation commences from the point of origin. Any fare increase requires collection of fare differentials upon issuing a new ticket.
    These rules, agreed upon by both parties, established that Air France was within its rights to refuse to honor expired tickets or segments not properly extended, and to require payment of additional charges prompted by fare increases approved by the CAB.

Knowledge and Notice of Ticket Restrictions by Respondents

The Court found that the GANAS, through their agent Teresita Manucdoc, had full knowledge of the ticket validity limitations and the requirement to pay fare differentials if extension was desired. Travel agent Lee Ella conveyed Air France’s position explicitly, and this notice was legally imputed to the GANAS. The respondents could not invoke ignorance of these conditions.

Unauthorized Validation of Tickets and Airline’s Liability

The Court ruled that the affixing of validating stickers by Lee Ella without Air France’s authorization was a violation of IATA rules and exceeded the agent's authority. Such acts did not confer any validity or extension to the tickets. Air France’s personnel at the airport allowing the GANAS to commence travel on

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.