Title
Agdao Landless Residents Association, Inc. vs. Maramion
Case
G.R. No. 188642
Decision Date
Oct 17, 2016
ALRAI members expelled without due process; land transfers violated donation terms; SC upheld CA, restoring membership, annulling void transfers, and requiring accounting records.

Case Summary (A.C. No. 6368)

Circumstances of the Case

The dispute centers around six Deeds of Donation executed by Dakudao & Sons, Inc. to ALRAI, which pertain to 46 titled lots. One donation specifically prohibits ALRAI from partitioning the lots for five years unless written permission is obtained from Dakudao. Notably, during a board meeting, ALRAI resolved to transfer some of these lots both to members and non-members, contrary to the terms set by the donation.

Legal Proceedings Initiated by Respondents

The ousted members filed a complaint arguing that they were expelled without due process and that the petitioners engaged in misconduct by improperly distributing the donated properties. Specifically, they contested the legitimacy of the membership dues imposed, the distribution of land titles in violation of the Deeds of Donation, due process violations, and lack of transparency in ALRAI's financial records.

Response from Petitioners

The petitioners defended their actions by asserting that they acted within their rights as officers of ALRAI and claimed that the ousted members were legally removed due to absences in meetings. They contended that the transfers of some of the lots were compensation for legitimate services rendered to the organization.

Ruling of the Regional Trial Court (RTC)

The RTC ruled in favor of the respondents, restoring their membership and ordering the annulment of the improper transfers of the donated lands. The court found that the ousted members were not given proper notice regarding their termination and that their expulsion constituted a violation of their rights under the Corporation Code, which necessitates due process in terminations.

Appeal to the Court of Appeals (CA)

The petitioners appealed the RTC decision; however, the CA affirmed the trial court’s ruling, agreeing that the ousters were conducted without requisite due process and that the transfers of titles were contrary to the provisions of the Deeds of Donation. The CA modified the RTC's ruling about specific land titles, validating some while declaring others void.

Key Legal Issues Addressed

  1. Reinstatement of Respondents: The courts upheld that the termination of membership lacked proper procedural adherence, thereby reinstating the ousted members. It was established that these members were bona fide and entitled to specific notifications regarding their membership status.

  2. Validity of Property Transfers: The legality of the property transfers was scrutinized. The courts largely found no legitimate corporate purpose justifying the titles issued to directors and officers. The requirement under the Corporation Code pertaining to the fair treatment of directors and officers was a significant consideration, particularly in governing contracts involving self-dealing.

Supreme Court Ruling

Upon further petitions, the Supreme Court partially granted the petitions, affirming the reinstatement of the respondents, yet modifying the CA’s ruling regar

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.