Title
Agbayani vs. Lupa Realty Holding Corp.
Case
G.R. No. 201193
Decision Date
Jun 10, 2019
A 91,899-sqm land in Cagayan was falsely sold, with forged deeds transferring ownership from Tranquilino to Lupa Realty via intermediaries. The Supreme Court nullified the fraudulent sales, reinstated Tranquilino’s title, and ruled Lupa Realty failed due diligence, dismissing claims of innocence.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 201193)

Key Dates

• June 7, 1979 – Issuance of Free Patent No. 587747 and OCT No. P-46041 to Tranquilino Agbayani.
• January 21, 1992 – Purported sale by Tranquilino to his brother Nonito (1992 DAS).
• May 30, 1997 – Purported sale by Nonito to Moriel Urdas.
• October 29, 1997 – Purported sale by Tranquilino directly to Lupa Realty (1997 DAS) and by Moriel to Lupa Realty.
• October 11, 1999 – Filing of Complaint for Reivindicacion, Cancellation of Title and Document with Damages by Tranquilino.
• June 15, 2009 – RTC decision nullifying TCT No. T-109129 and reinstating OCT No. P-46041.
• September 14, 2011 – CA decision reversing the RTC and dismissing all claims.
• March 9, 2012 – Denial of motion for reconsideration by the CA.
• June 10, 2019 – Supreme Court resolution granting the Petition for Review under Rule 45.

Applicable Law

• 1987 Philippine Constitution (decision post-1990).
• Presidential Decree No. 1529 (Property Registration Decree), especially Sec. 53 on void registrations.
• Civil Code: Articles 1346 (simulation), 1409(2) (absolutely simulated contracts).
• Rules of Court: Rule 45 (Certiorari), Rule 129 Sec. 4 (judicial admissions), Rule 132 Sec. 19(b) (public documents).

Factual Background

Tranquilino discovered in April 1999 that Lupa Realty was listed as owner in the Sta. Ana tax rolls and that TCT No. T-109129 had been issued under a Deed of Absolute Sale dated October 29, 1997, bearing his alleged signature. He denied executing or receiving payment under that deed and asserted forgery. Lupa Realty countered that it acquired the land through a valid chain: from Tranquilino to Nonito (1992 DAS), from Nonito to Moriel (1997 DAS), and from Moriel to Lupa Realty (October 29, 1997). It invoked innocent purchaser in good faith. Lupa Realty impleaded Moriel to enforce warranty, while Moriel impleaded Nonito, alleging Lupa Realty’s staff registered the deed. Nonito claimed undue pressure and ignorance that the document was not a loan mortgage but a sale.

RTC Decision

The RTC found by preponderance that both the 1992 and 1997 deeds executed in Tranquilino’s name were falsified; it also ruled that Lupa Realty was not an innocent purchaser. It cancelled TCT No. T-109129, reinstated OCT No. P-46041, and ordered indemnity among parties for attorney’s fees and damages.

CA Decision

The Court of Appeals reversed, holding that Tranquilino failed to prove forgery of the 1992 DAS or overcome the presumption of regularity. It deemed the mere existence of the 1997 DAS insufficient to invalidate Lupa Realty’s Torrens title and characterized the attack as collateral, thus impermissible. It also credited Lupa Realty as an innocent purchaser.

Issues on Appeal

  1. Whether the CA erred in reversing the RTC’s declaration of nullity of TCT No. T-109129.
  2. Whether Tranquilino’s action constituted a collateral, not direct, attack on a Torrens title.
  3. Whether Lupa Realty qualified as an innocent purchaser for value.

Supreme Court Ruling – Conflict in Factual Findings

Recognizing a direct conflict between the RTC and CA on material facts, the Supreme Court exercised its discretion under Rule 45 to review both law and fact. The RTC found both deeds falsified; the CA validated the 1992 DAS and did not resolve the 1997 DAS or Lupa Realty’s good faith.

Supreme Court Ruling – 1997 Deed of Absolute Sale

The Court identified multiple indicia of simulation in the 1997 DAS:
• Identical notarial details (Doc. No., Page, Book, Series) with the Moriel-to-Lupa Realty deed, despite different parties.
• Reference to an unrelated OCT No. P-26619 and homestead patent, not Tranquilino’s OCT No. P-46041 and free patent.
• Inclusion of Lupa Realty’s president as party and CTC details without his signature.
• Exact same date of execution as Moriel’s deed.
• Suppression of the 1997 DAS by Lupa Realty in its evidence list.
These defects establish absolute simulation (Art. 1409(2), 1346) and, under PD 1529 Sec. 53, render the registration void.

Supreme Court Ruling – 1992 Deed of A




...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.