Title
Supreme Court
ABS-CBN IJM Workers Union vs. ABS-CBN Corporation
Case
G.R. No. 202131
Decision Date
Sep 21, 2022
Dispute over employer-employee relationship between ABS-CBN and IJM workers; DOLE Secretary ruled in favor of workers, upheld by Supreme Court, allowing certification election.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 202131)

Applicable Law

The decision is based on the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines and relevant provisions from the Labor Code, particularly Articles 224 and 232 concerning employer-employee relationships and the jurisdiction of the Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) and Labor Arbiters.

Facts and Antecedent Proceedings

In 2002, ABS-CBN implemented the IJM system, which profiles freelance workers (IJM workers) across various technical and creative positions. The AIWU, which comprises 1,101 IJM workers, sought to be recognized as their exclusive bargaining agent, filing a petition for a certification election on November 23, 2009. However, ABS-CBN opposed the petition, claiming no employer-employee relationship existed between the company and the IJM workers, citing prior rulings from the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC).

Mediator-Arbiter’s Decision

The Mediator-Arbiter dismissed AIWU's petition for a certification election on April 14, 2010, affirming the lack of an employer-employee relationship based on existing decisions in previous cases (Payonan and Jalog). Consequently, AIWU appealed this decision to the DOLE Secretary, who later ruled in favor of AIWU, reversing the Mediator-Arbiter's order.

DOLE Secretary’s Ruling

On August 13, 2010, the DOLE Secretary concluded that significant evidence indicated the existence of an employer-employee relationship, thus granting AIWU's petition for a certification election. The Secretary highlighted that the IJM workers performed essential functions for ABS-CBN and had a relationship akin to employees, consistent with the findings in similar prior cases.

Court of Appeals’ Ruling

ABS-CBN sought to overturn the DOLE Secretary's decision in the Court of Appeals, which ruled that the existence of an employer-employee relationship is a question of fact needing detailed examination by the labor arbiter. The appellate court found that the DOLE overstepped its jurisdiction by making a determination on employment status, as previous rulings by the NLRC were still pending appeal.

Supreme Court’s Review

The Supreme Court, in its examination, determined that the DOLE Secretary acted within her jurisdiction by finding an employer-employee relationship based on substantial evidence. The Court emphasized that the Bureau of Labor Relations has the authority to determine this r

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.