Case Summary (G.R. No. 167006-07)
Relevant Facts and Antecedents
The petitioner, Estrella Abid-Babano, who served as a Regional Director of the Department of Education (DepEd) for Region XII, was found guilty of simple neglect of duty by the Presidential Anti-Graft Commission (PAGC) for her failure to include her husband's vehicles in her SALN for the years 2000 to 2005. She contested the charges, asserting that the vehicles belonged to her husband, Macmod S. Pangandaman, and that, as per their property regime of complete separation of property, she had no obligation to declare them.
Judicial History
The Office of the President upheld the PAGC’s findings, resulting in a six-month suspension for the petitioner. Upon appeal, the Court of Appeals affirmed the ruling of the Office of the President. The case progressed through various petitions and motions for reconsideration, which were all denied, leading to the primary issue on appeal regarding the implications of her non-disclosure of her husband’s assets in her SALN.
Central Issue
The primary legal question centered on whether Estrella Abid-Babano's non-inclusion of her husband’s vehicles in her SALN constituted a neglect of duty or a good faith mistake, particularly given their specific property regime under Muslim Personal Laws.
Legal Basis and Interpretation
The decision relies on the provisions of the 1987 Philippine Constitution and Republic Act No. 6713, which mandates that government officials to declare their assets and those of their spouses and unmarried children living with them. However, the Court also considered the implications of the complete separation of property regime as governed by Article 38 of the Code of Muslim Personal Laws, determining that this property regime exempts spouses from disclosing each other’s assets held outside a common household.
Court Rulings and Findings
The Court found in favor of the petitioner, recognizing that her failure to disclose her husband’s vehicles was not actionable due to the legal frameworks surrounding their property arrangement. The Court noted that the law does not distinguish between property regimes, and thus, requiring such disclosures when there is a complete separation of property would be inequitable. The judgment emphasized that marital property laws permit each spouse to manage their own assets independently, which further supports the conclusion that the petitioner was not obligated to include her husband’s properties in her SALN.
Implications of the Decision
Th
...continue readingCase Syllabus (G.R. No. 167006-07)
Case Overview
- Case Citation: 860 Phil. 475 EN BANC [G.R. No. 201176, August 28, 2019]
- Petitioner: Estrella Abid-Babano
- Respondent: Executive Secretary
- Decision Date: August 28, 2019
Background of the Case
- The case revolves around the interpretation of Republic Act No. 6713, which mandates that government officials file a sworn Statement of Assets, Liabilities, and Net Worth (SALN) that includes the assets of their spouses.
- The petitioner, Estrella Abid-Babano, a Regional Director of the Department of Education, was found guilty of simple neglect of duty for not disclosing her husband’s motor vehicles in her SALN.
Antecedents
- The Presidential Anti-Graft Commission (PAGC) recommended the suspension of the petitioner for six months to one year due to her failure to declare in her SALN specific vehicle assets owned by her husband.
- The PAGC also found her not guilty of other charges, including failing to declare three lots instead of one.
- The petitioner contended that the undeclared vehicles were owned by her husband, who filed his own SALN, and argued that she was not required to include her husband's properties due to their marital property regime of complete separation of property.
Ruling of the Office of the President (OP)
- The OP upheld PAGC’s findings, declaring the petitioner guilty of simple neglect of duty and imposing a suspension of six months.
- The OP maintained the position that under Republic Act No. 6713, public officials must disclose their spouses' assets in t