G.R. No. 189698 - Quinto vs. Commission on Elections

Ask AI

G.R. No. 189698: Quinto vs. Commission on Elections

Getting related questions...
What do you want to know about the case?
Your conversations and searches stay on your device. We do not store or track your activity on our servers. To know more about our privacy commitment see jur.ph/privacy Ask AI provides quick answers grounded in full case texts to avoid mistakes. Always verify with the original text.

Ask AI

Title Supreme Court: Quinto vs. Commission on Elections

Case: G.R. No. 189698

Decision Date: Dec 1, 2009

Appointive officials challenged COMELEC Resolution No. 8678, arguing ipso facto resignation upon filing CoCs violated equal protection. SC ruled it unconstitutional, holding resignation should occur at campaign period start.

unconstitutional provision

equal protection clause

appointive officials

Marathon 3 hr 29 min

12.3x of typical case length

END