G.R. No. 205838 - Poole-Blunden vs. Union Bank of the Philippines

Poole-Blunden vs. Union Bank of the Philippines

Getting related questions...
Conversations stay on your device. We do not store or track your activity on our servers. Know more about your privacy jur.ph/privacy Ask AI provides quick answers grounded in full case texts to avoid mistakes. Always verify with the original text.

Ask AI

Title Supreme Court: Poole-Blunden vs. Union Bank of the Philippines

Case: G.R. No. 205838

Decision Date: Nov 29, 2017

Petitioner sought annulment of a condominium sale due to a 25% discrepancy in advertised vs. actual area. Supreme Court ruled in his favor, citing fraud, vitiated consent, and bank negligence, awarding damages and refunds.

buyer

contract

damages

Very Long 34 min

END