"ART. 299. Robbery in an inhabited house or public building or Office devoted to worship.Any armed person who shall commit robbery in an inhabited house or public building or edifice devoted to religious worship, shall be punished by reclusion temporal, if the value of the property taken shall exceed 250 pesos, and if
"(a) The malefactors shall enter the house or building in which the robbery was committed, by any of the following means:
*****
"3. By using false keys, picklocks or similar tools." supplied.)
Art. 302. Robbery in an uninhabited place or in a private building. - Any robbery committed in an uninhabited place or in a building other than those mentioned in the first paragraph of article 299, if the value of the property taken exceeds 250 pesos, shall be punished by prision correccional in its medium and maximum periods provided that any of the following circumstances is present:
*****
"3. If the entrance has been effected through the use of keys, picklocks or other similar tools." (Italics supplied.)
Since picking of locks is one way to gain entrance to commit robbery, a picklock is per se specially adapted to the commission of robbery. The description in the information of a picklock as "specially adapted to the commission of robbery" is therefore unnecessary for its sufficiency. Notwithstanding the omission of such superfluous description, therefore, the charge of the offense of illegal possession of a picklock is .valid. We find both elements of the crime clearly alleged in the information in question.
Furthermore, the information alleged illegal possession of "seven (7) false keys." The Revised Penal Code, in Article 306 defines "false keys" to include "the tools mentioned in the next preceding article." Article 304 ""the next preceding article"mentions "picklocks or similar tools specially adapted to the commission of the crime of robbery." It follows that the term "false keys" appearing in the information sufficiently describes such tools.
Wherefore, the order quashing the information is hereby set aside and the case is remanded for further trial, without costs. It is so ordered.
Bautista Angela, Concepcion, Reyes, J. B. L., Barrera, Paredes, Dizon, Regala, Makalintal, and Zaldivar, JJ., concur.