G.R. No. 164250 - Office of the Ombudsman vs. Valera

Ask AI

G.R. No. 164250: Office of the Ombudsman vs. Valera

Getting related questions...
What do you want to know about the case?
Your conversations and searches stay on your device. We do not store or track your activity on our servers. To know more about our privacy commitment see jur.ph/privacy Ask AI provides quick answers grounded in full case texts to avoid mistakes. Always verify with the original text.

Ask AI

Title Supreme Court: Office of the Ombudsman vs. Valera

Case: G.R. No. 164250

Decision Date: Sep 30, 2005

Atty. Valera, accused of graft and misconduct, challenged his preventive suspension by the Special Prosecutor. The Supreme Court ruled the suspension invalid, citing lack of authority and insufficient evidence.

preventive suspension

null and void

administrative case

Very Long 43 min

2.5x of typical case length

END