G.R. No. L-20387 - Morfe vs. Mutuc

Morfe vs. Mutuc

Getting related questions...
Conversations stay on your device. We do not store or track your activity on our servers. Know more about your privacy jur.ph/privacy Ask AI provides quick answers grounded in full case texts to avoid mistakes. Always verify with the original text.

Ask AI

Title Supreme Court: Morfe vs. Mutuc

Case: G.R. No. L-20387

Decision Date: Jan 31, 1968

A judge challenged the constitutionality of requiring public officials to file periodic sworn statements of assets and liabilities, arguing it violated privacy and due process. The Supreme Court upheld the law, ruling it a valid exercise of police power to ensure transparency and prevent corruption.

constitutionality

provision

sworn statements

Very Long 41 min

END