A.C. No. 13911 - Joy Cadiogan Calixto vs. Atty. Cora Jane P. Baleros

Joy Cadiogan Calixto vs. Atty. Cora Jane P. Baleros

Getting related questions...
What do you want to know about the case?
Your conversations and searches stay on your device. We do not store or track your activity on our servers. To know more about our privacy commitment see jur.ph/privacy Ask AI provides quick answers grounded in full case texts to avoid mistakes. Always verify with the original text.

Ask AI

Title Supreme Court: Joy Cadiogan Calixto vs. Atty. Cora Jane P. Baleros

Case: A.C. No. 13911

Decision Date: Oct 3, 2023

Joy and Rimas Calixto alleged fraud after their property was transferred without consent via a forged SPA notarized by Atty. Baleros, who violated notarial rules. The Supreme Court suspended her for two years and permanently disqualified her as a notary.

suspension

notarial practice

legal ethics

Very Long 32 min

END