Title
Escueta vs. Pando
Case
Adm. Case No. 174
Decision Date
Mar 12, 1946
Plaintiff sought refund of P787.89 after defendant sold lot despite novated agreement; SC ruled for plaintiff, requiring judicial rescission and refund with interest from complaint filing.
Short 11 min

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.