G.R. No. L-264 - Encarnacion vs. Baldomar

Encarnacion vs. Baldomar

Getting related questions...
Conversations stay on your device. We do not store or track your activity on our servers. Know more about your privacy jur.ph/privacy Ask AI provides quick answers grounded in full case texts to avoid mistakes. Always verify with the original text.

Ask AI

Title Supreme Court: Encarnacion vs. Baldomar

Case: G.R. No. L-264

Decision Date: Oct 4, 1946

Post-WWII, lessor Vicente Singson Encarnacion demanded tenants vacate for office use; tenants refused, citing indefinite lease. Courts ruled lease was month-to-month, favoring lessor.

lease

vacate

leased house

Very Short 4 min

END