Title
ZamoraNo.vs. People
Case
G.R. No. 193902
Decision Date
Jun 1, 2011
Zamoranos' marriage to Pacasum deemed valid as her prior Islamic divorce under Muslim law negated bigamy claims; jurisdiction errors overturned.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 193902)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Consolidation of Cases and Parties
    • Three petitions for review on certiorari under Rule 45: G.R. Nos. 193902, 193908 (Zamoranos vs. People of the Philippines and Samson R. Pacasum, Sr.), and G.R. No. 194075 (Pacasum vs. Zamoranos).
    • Court of Appeals (CA) Decision dated July 30, 2010 in CA-G.R. SP No. 03525-MIN dismissed Zamoranos’s petition for certiorari and affirmed RTC Branch 6, Lanao del Norte, in Criminal Case No. 06-12305 for Bigamy filed by Pacasum.
  • Zamoranos’s First Marriage and Divorce
    • April 28, 1982: Marietta D. Zamoranos converts from Roman Catholicism to Islam.
    • May 3, 1982: Islamic (nikah) marriage to Jesus (Mohamad) de Guzman solemnized by Ustadz Abdullah Ha-Ja-Utto in Isabela, Basilan.
    • July 30, 1982: Civil marriage before RTC Quezon City, Judge Perfecto Laguio.
    • December 18, 1983: Talaq divorce by de Guzman; confirmed by Shari’a Circuit Court, Basilan, issuing Decree of Divorce on June 18, 1992.
  • Zamoranos’s Second Marriage and Domestic Relations
    • December 20, 1989: Islamic marriage to Samson R. Pacasum, Sr., her subordinate at the Bureau of Customs, in Balo-i, Lanao del Norte.
    • December 28, 1992: Civil marriage before RTC Iligan City, Judge Valerio Salazar.
    • Issue of three children: Samson Jr., Sam Jean, and Sam Joon; de facto separation in 1998; custody agreement on October 18, 1999 awarding primary custody to Zamoranos.
  • Pacasum’s Civil, Criminal, and Administrative Actions
    • March 31, 2003: Petition for Annulment of Marriage (Civil Case No. 6249, RTC Iligan City), amended May 31, 2004 to Declaration of Void Marriage on ground of bigamy and subsisting first marriage.
    • October 25, 2004: Criminal complaint for Bigamy under RPC Article 349 filed with City Prosecutor of Iligan City.
    • Separate administrative complaints for dismissal and disbarment before CSC, IBP, and BFRIPS—later dismissed.
  • Criminal Proceedings for Bigamy
    • February 2, 2005: City Prosecutor finds prima facie evidence.
    • April 29, 2005: Acting City Prosecutor of Ozamiz City grants Zamoranos’s motion for reconsideration and dismisses the Bigamy charge.
    • August 15, 2005: Denial of Pacasum’s motion for reconsideration.
    • February 7, 2006: Secretary of Justice reverses prosecutorial resolutions and reinstates Bigamy charge.
    • May 17, 2006: Secretary of Justice denies Zamoranos’s omnibus motions to reconsider, hold the case in abeyance, or quash warrant.
    • February 22, 2006: Information for Bigamy docketed as Criminal Case No. 06-12305, RTC Branch 6, Iligan City.
  • Civil Case No. 6249 and Jurisdictional Rulings
    • RTC Branch 2, Iligan City, dismisses Pacasum’s petition for want of jurisdiction, citing exclusive competence of Shari’a Circuit Court over Muslim marriages/divorce under P.D. No. 1083.
    • CA and Supreme Court affirm dismissal; final and executory on April 3, 2009.
    • August 7, 2009: RTC Branch 6 reinstates Criminal Case No. 06-12305 upon Pacasum’s motion.
    • December 21, 2009: RTC Branch 6 denies Zamoranos’s Motion to Quash the Information; reconsideration likewise denied.
    • CA dismisses Zamoranos’s petition for certiorari for lack of grave abuse of discretion; treats denial of motion to quash as error of judgment, not jurisdiction.

Issues:

  • Propriety of Certiorari to Assail Denial of Motion to Quash
    • Whether the CA correctly held that Zamoranos’s certiorari petition was an improper remedy for an interlocutory denial of a motion to quash.
    • Whether the RTC, Branch 6, acted with or without jurisdiction or grave abuse of discretion in continuing with the Bigamy case.
  • Determination of Zamoranos’s Muslim Status and Jurisdictional Effect
    • Whether RTC Branch 2 and the CA correctly found that (a) Zamoranos is a Muslim; (b) her marriage and divorce with de Guzman were governed by P.D. No. 1083; and (c) Shari’a Circuit Courts have exclusive jurisdiction over those matters.
    • Consequence of that finding on the RTC’s jurisdiction to try the Bigamy offense under the RPC.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.