Title
Zamora vs. Court of Appeals
Case
G.R. No. 141917
Decision Date
Feb 7, 2007
Bernardino's marriage nullity complaint is dismissed for lack of sufficient evidence of psychological incapacity under Article 36 of the Family Code.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 141917)

Facts:

  • Bernardino S. Zamora (petitioner) and Norma Mercado Zamora (respondent) were married on June 4, 1970, in Cebu City, Philippines.
  • The couple lived together at No. 50-A Gorordo Avenue, Cebu City, and had no children.
  • Norma left for the United States in 1972 to work as a nurse, returning briefly before leaving again in 1974.
  • She made periodic visits to Cebu City until 1989, by which time she had become a U.S. citizen.
  • Bernardino filed for the declaration of nullity of their marriage, claiming Norma was psychologically incapacitated under Article 36 of the Family Code.
  • He argued that her fear of having children and her abandonment by living in the U.S. constituted psychological incapacity.
  • Norma denied these claims, asserting her love for children and accusing Bernardino of infidelity, claiming he had two affairs and fathered at least three children with other women.
  • The Regional Trial Court dismissed Bernardino's complaint on June 22, 1995, finding no evidence of psychological incapacity and noting Bernardino's infidelity contributed to their marital issues.
  • Bernardino appealed to the Court of Appeals, which affirmed the trial court's decision on August 5, 1999, ruling that Bernardino failed to prove psychological incapacity.
  • His motion for reconsideration was denied on January 24, 2000, leading to his petition for certiorari.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court denied the petition and affirmed the decisions of the Court of Appeals dated August 5, 1999, and January 24, 2000.
  • The Court ruled that Bernardino failed...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court emphasized that the burden of proof lies with the petitioner to demonstrate the nullity of the marriage.
  • Psychological incapacity must be medically or clinically identified and proven by expert testimony.
  • Mere al...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.