Title
Zaguirre vs. Castillo
Case
A.C. No. 4921
Decision Date
Mar 6, 2003
An attorney was indefinitely suspended for gross immoral conduct involving an illicit relationship and failing to acknowledge and support his child.
Font Size

Case Digest (A.C. No. 4921)

Facts:

  • Carmelita I. Zaguirre filed a disbarment petition against Atty. Alfredo Castillo.
  • The Supreme Court of the Philippines decided the case on March 6, 2003.
  • Zaguirre and Castillo were officemates at the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) in 1996.
  • Castillo courted Zaguirre, falsely claiming to be single, and they had an intimate relationship until 1997.
  • Castillo passed the bar examinations and was admitted to the Philippine Bar on May 10, 1997.
  • Zaguirre discovered Castillo was married when his wife confronted her in May 1997.
  • After Zaguirre became pregnant, Castillo executed an affidavit acknowledging their relationship and the unborn child.
  • Following the birth of their daughter, Aletha Jessa, on December 9, 1997, Castillo refused to recognize the child or provide support.
  • Castillo denied the relationship, claiming it was based on mutual lust and asserting that Zaguirre was aware of his marital status.
  • The Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) found Castillo guilty of gross immoral conduct and recommended indefinite suspension.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court found Atty. Alfredo Castillo guilty of gross immoral conduct.
  • Castillo was ordered to undergo indefinite suspension from the practice of law.
  • The suspension will continue until Castillo can prove to the court...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Court's decision was based on the Code of Professional Responsibility, which prohibits immoral or deceitful conduct by lawyers.
  • Castillo's extramarital affair and denial of responsibility for his child were deemed grossly immoral, undermining the integrity of the legal profession.
  • The Court emphasized that immorality must shock the community's sense of decency, and Castillo's actions fell short of expected standards.
  • The Court re...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.